Saturday, September 30, 2006

“无校”风波暴露马华当家不当权的窘境



“无校” 风波暴露马华当家不当权窘境
马华中央教育局毋须模糊焦点自圆其说

民主行动党全国中委兼非政府组织局主任刘天球文告
2006年9月30日

随着副教育部长诺奥马在民主行动党国会议员古拉的步步紧逼之下,在国会坦言第九大马计划下兴建的180间新校,无一是华小或淡小,而且表明这是国阵向来的政策之后,华社才惊觉事态严重,对马华和国阵口诛笔伐。

虽然诺奥马在发言时态度嚣张,但是他直接道出真相,我们还是应该要感谢他。没有他的真话,马华和其它国阵领袖,不晓得还要继续蒙骗华社和印度社会多久。

内阁为了挽救马华,避免选票流失,赶快推出一间早在七年前就批准迁校的古来二小,以及属于宏愿学校计划的布特拉高原敦陈修信小学,当作新的华小来作出“交待” ,不但形同欺骗华社,而且当华社是乞丐一般来施舍,令人愤慨!

向来高喊“与华小共存亡” 的马华,在争取建校的事件上节节败退,可是还是发表不确实的言论来掩盖本身的过失,意图模糊焦点,逃避现实。

民主行动党创党四十年以来坚决捍卫华教,众所周知;虽然因此付出严重的代价,却从来不敢邀功。反对党领袖林吉祥提起古拉在国会逼问诺奥马的事件,纯属就事论事,马华大可不必紧张。

内阁在重大压力之下仅仅宣布兴建两间不算“新” 的华小,根本是杯水车薪,解决不了华小严重缺乏的问题,马华不必也不应太过高兴,反之应该做好本分,继续努力争取增建华小。

董教总已经宣布,目前全国总共缺少134间华小,而且已经提出详细的报告,还在等待与首相会谈,马华不应从中作梗,而且应该停止自我矮化和自我边缘化。

马华中央教育局的文告提出的所谓两个重点(内阁及教育部申明政府会增建华小的政策,以及政府打破以往的做法,自2000年以来,开始为一些华小承担100%的兴建费) ,其实“言过其实” ,根本“另有文章” 。

其实,国阵政府只有在大选或补选的压力,才会兴建一些华淡小来捞取选票,充其量是“政府策略”,并不是什么政府政策。

白小就是一个最典型的例子。2000年,因为行动党和华社上下大力反对关闭白小原校,内阁被迫打破先例,拨款一千两百万令吉,并且“破天荒”在八个月内建起新的丽阳镇白小(相对与陆庭谕老师常提起,等待了18年才建好的大古来华小)。这是华社的压力促成,绝对不是国阵新的政策。

过后的巴生兴华小学,也是因为面对行动党的严峻挑战,为了破解2004年大选的压力,不得不由政府拨款兴建。

至于万达镇的培才二小,也是为了破解行动党的威胁,担心流失八打灵华裔选票,将当地过剩的一间国小校舍(当地有三间国小过剩) 直接列为培才二小,成为“史无前例” 的大选糖果。

以上的事实,都是八打灵和巴生华教人士最清楚不过的事实。

该局文告所列的柔佛再也华小,帝沙再也华小,康乐二校,安邦二校,都属于同样的性质,都是为了破解反对党大选压力的产物。马华还敢邀功,说是” 经过马华领导等人士,通过策略性不间断的游说,争取及营造而得“,更是令人不敢恭维,甚至有点那个了。

至于敦陈祯禄学校和敦陈修信学校,同属宏愿学校,都不是华社所要的学校,当然只好由政府100% 出钱啦!

此外,该局主任指这项决定已经记录在案,其实并不确实;把教育部长在新闻发布会的谈话当作是“增建华小是政府的政策,不增建华小不是政府的政策” ,更是有意误导华社,欺骗华社。

事实上,马华,国大党和其它华基政党的部长,早在八十年代就在内阁集体同意巫统的建议,不再兴建任何华小和淡小。这是他们从来不敢公开承认的事实。

这也是为什么第六,第七,第八以及第九大马计划,从来没有列入兴建任何华淡小的计划的真正原因。

所有的地方政府大蓝图,从来只有马来学校和宗教学校保留地,也是因为国阵这项未明文的既定政策使然。

我们希望华社和友族社会上下一心,在兴建华淡小方面拒绝国阵“乞丐式的施舍教育手段”,不要被一两间所谓的华小所轻易打发,反之全面争取兴建更多华淡小,同时更要打醒精神,严防华淡小变质。

/ 刘天球

Dr Wong Sai Hou caught red-handed




Kg Tunku state assemblyman Dr Wong Sai Hou had promised the residents that he will "wash his hands" over his illegally erected service centre located opposite the Paramount LRT station in a dialogue.

But he quietly influenced the PJ Draft Plan committee to insert an item to "legalize" the plan.

He was caught red-handed by DAP PJ Action Team. When the local residents were informed about the plot, they staged a protest last Wednesday and submitted 15 sets of protest to MBPJ on the same afternoon.

I have requested the new Mayor in my courtesy call last Friday to visit the site and take the necessary actions.

Here are two seperate stories published by Sinchew and China Press on the protest on Wednesday morning...


居民反對建服務中心 要求展延修改大藍圖期限
updated:2006-09-29 11:30:47 MYT


■居民手持布條表示不要他們身後的建築物成為服務中心,希望涉及者表態有關建築的真正用途。(放大)


(八打靈再也訊)百樂花園20/24的居民週五將要求八打靈再也市政廳,展延修改靈市大藍圖聽證會的最後期限,以讓居民有足夠的時間向有關方面做出反對。約20名居民今早在八打靈再也火箭行動隊主席劉永山、顧問劉天球和財政吳炳順陪同下,拉布條堅決抗議6947號地段被發展成服務中心的工程。


擔心服務中心引人潮

有關地段處於百樂花園布特拉輕快鐵站對面。居民表示,該地屬私人所有,原是一片空地。他們指有關建築非常礙眼,更擔心服務中心日後吸引人潮,引發更嚴重的交通阻塞、吵雜等問題。

抗議行動領導人陳文龍指出,居民於2003年至今,已先後會見甘榜東姑區州議員黃世豪和八打靈再也南區國會議員拿督林祥才,表達他們不願興建有關建築的意願。

“黃世豪在我們的面前指出,他將不再處理有關工程(Wash hand on this project)。可是,我們卻在本月1日發覺市政廳在打藍圖中,建議把此地段的用途,從房屋改為服務站中心。

“我們必定會在聽證會期限結束之前,呈交抗議書堅決反對修改有關大藍圖的建議。”

劉永山指出,20/24路共有32人家,他們在2003年就已開始反對上述工程。但為何市議會在眾人反對聲之下,堅持己見批准策劃準證給發展商發展土地,直至一連串的民意反彈之後,才停止工程?他非議,市政廳不但不拆毀該建築屋,還選擇以修改大藍圖的方式,來合理化之前的錯誤。

“八打靈再也火箭行動隊將于明日致函市政廳,在1976年城鄉規劃法令第十三(三)條文下,要求將聽證會展延4個星期,以便讓更多靈市市民能夠前往市政廳檢閱藍圖修改。”

黃世豪:尊重居民意願

另一方面,黃世豪受詢時表示,他們已決定尊重居民的意願,不會在有關地段興建服務中心。“修改的大藍圖只是一項建議,並非最後決定。地主已通知市政廳這項決定。”他強調,有關建築的用途將會用來充作住宅,不是服務中心。 (星洲日報/大都會‧2005/09/28)

今日焦點:住宅地段變會所 居民致函反對沒受理
● 地點:靈市24/20路
位于民宅旁的服務中心建築已成雛型,經過居民多番反對,現已停工。


(八打靈再也28日訊)居民不滿八打靈再也市政廳“靜悄悄”把靈市20/24路某住宅地段改為“民眾會堂或服務中心”地段,以及有人在未獲批准信下,即大興土木建2層樓會所。


居民懷疑當地州議員透過本身在市政廳的“影響力”,更改相關地段用途,以興建本身的服務中心會所。


不過,有關州議員已作出否認,並強調市政廳已決定把該地段改回房屋用途,相關建築工程已終止。


根據八打靈再也火箭行動隊主席劉永山指出,該地段原是片空地,居民于2003年9月3日接獲八打靈再也市議會(現為市政廳)通知來信,通知該空地將興建民眾會堂或服務中心,影響逾40戶居民。


他說,居民以民宅範圍不宜建民眾會堂,他們無需服務中心為由大力反對這項工程,但當局一直沒有回應,居民于去年杪再度呈信給市政廳作出反對,同樣沒結果。


地段空間有限


他表示,市政廳于今年2月發信通知居民,當局決定發出策劃批准信給地主,當局未發出批准信,地主就于半年前動工,引起居民極度不滿。


他今日會見居民后,這么指出。隨同者包括行動隊顧問劉天球、財政吳炳順及居民行動委員會主席陳文龍。


陳文龍指出,他們曾2度向市政廳提呈反對工程的備忘錄和意願,甚至會見涉及的甘榜東姑州議員拿督黃世豪和八打靈南區國會議員拿督林祥才,卻沒有結果。


他強調,這裡是住宅區,相關地段空間有限,不適宜建民眾會堂或服務中心。


劉永山指出,他們于上週會見市長商討此事,發現地方發展修改草擬圖中,該地段已由房屋地改為民眾會堂或服務中心用途,而居民也揭發發展工程地主與土地局註冊地主身份有出入。


居民要求州議員能清楚交代,並協助要求市政廳處理因停工而遭廢置的建築物。


接受意見期限沒公佈險錯失反對機會


八打靈再也市政廳在地方藍圖草擬圖測出爐后,未對外公佈正式接受意見為期1個月,導致居民直到截止期限前一天才知曉此事,差點錯過提呈反對建議書的機會。


八打靈再也火箭行動隊主席劉永山指出,該草擬藍圖于9月1日出爐,並開放給居民提供反建議至本月29日,但當局卻未對外公佈這項訊息,反而是他們前往市政廳偶然發現此事。


“市政客廳此舉將讓居民失去針對本身地區發展提呈意見的機會,尤其不利居民的計劃。”


他以百樂園20/24路的問題為例,居民不知情而沒提呈反意見,市政廳就批准當地興建民眾會堂或服務中心工程。


他今日會見居民后,這么指出。


行動队顧問劉天球吁請市政廳把相關藍圖貼上網讓居民過目,及透過電郵方式提供意見。


劉永山指出,他們明日將要求市政廳援引1976年城鄉規劃法令第13(3)條文,延長公眾檢閱地方草擬藍圖期限至10月杪,讓居民能有更充足時間檢閱和提供意見。


另外,百樂園居民行動委員會已成功收集15份反建議書,明日(29日)呈上市政廳。


黃世豪:考量後認同意見工程6月已停工


甘榜東姑州議員拿督黃世豪承認,百樂園20/24路的空地並不適宜建民眾會堂暨服務中心,而八打靈再也市政廳已終止有關工程。


同時,市政廳將會在地方藍圖內,把該土地修改為房屋用途。


他說,市政廳是因為居民極力反對,及考量該空地不適宜建民眾會堂暨服務中心,而作出上述決定。


“該工程已在6月停工。” 他今日接受本報電訪,針對居民指責他聯合私人地主在當地興建服務中心一事,這么指出。

居民透露,他們6月與靈南區國會議員拿督林祥才和黃世豪對話期間,黃世豪曾說明該地是私人地段,他本身也已決定放棄在該處興建服務中心會所,不想再受牽連。

黃世豪表示,他是受地主獻議,在當地建設服務中心,后來經過多番視察和考量,大家都認為在當地建服務中心非常不當,而他也認為不適合,決定停止有關工程。

Friday, September 29, 2006

DAP Education Forum: Crisis and Breakthrough

华教运动反守为攻时机到
华总受促配合董教总行事
MALAYSIAKINI 郭史光庆Sep 29, 06 10:21am

华教反攻的时机已到!政治工作者与华社华团,应该趁华小拨款遭“干捞”和政府宣布不增建华小的课题闹得沸沸扬扬时,顺应目前的政治局势,反守为攻,展开行动恢复身为公民的母语教育权利。

这是数位主讲人在昨晚一场讲座“从希山慕丁VS翁诗杰看:华小危机,如何突围?”上发出的呼吁。

这场由行动党主办的讲座,邀请了国会反对党领袖林吉祥、行动党大山脚国会议员章瑛、华总副总会长周世杨和黄汉良主讲,主持人为胡逸山。

民众必须有强大的意愿

林吉祥表示,人民应该趁目前的时机,发动一场浩大的民间运动,纠正半世纪以来的边缘化政策,要求政府公平对待各族母语教育的发展。“民众必须有强大的意愿,否则行动党在国会只有12名议员,国阵政府的部长人数都多过这个数目。”

也是森华堂主席的周世杨也表示“时候到了”,认为华教运动目前是时候反守为攻,为政者应该拟定短、中、长期目标全盘计划,结合所有的力量进行突围。“关键时刻到来的时候,人民很重要,力量必须发酵......华教多年来都在防守,没有进攻,以致多年来都节节败退。”

章瑛:不建华小不给票

他呼吁在朝的华基政党必须更加勇敢,在野的政党则应该更有智慧,“希望行动党能够改变策略,配合华团”。

章瑛则希望人民看透国阵政府的“糖果政治”,在来届大选里壮大反对党,让反对党更有效地监督政府施政。“人民必须通过投票传达讯息,不建华小不给票!”

此外,副教育部长诺奥玛指政府无意在第9大马计划下增建华小,之后教育部长希山慕丁却宣布政府将“增建”两所“新华小”,还指自己和马华总会长黄家定早已进行讨论,只是诺奥玛不知情的政治骗局,也为林吉祥一语道破。

林吉祥:诺奥玛被迫吃死猫

林吉祥说,“两个人偷偷摸摸讨论,教育部怎么会这样?就连两个副部长(诺奥玛和韩春锦)都不知道”。

“我骂过诺奥玛很多次,但是这次他是说真话,是代表教育部的政策,现在却被迫吃死猫。”“如果诺奥玛说错话,黄家定和希山慕丁为什么没有立刻纠正,要等到一周后的内阁会议后才出来做戏?”

他也调侃阿都拉通过内安部指示媒体停止报道华小拨款遭骑劫事件。“人民以为自己投选了一个包青天,如果出现干捞事件,他应该叫他身边的王朝和马汉进行调查,但是他反而指示媒体把新闻压下来。”

黄汉良:国小教华文有利华教针对国小教华文的新政策

也是隆雪华堂会长的黄汉良认为,让友族学生学习华语对华教的发展有利,“使人们学习华文就象各国人民学习英文一样,华文不再成为敏感课题,问题就可能获得解决”。

他表示,随着中国的崛起和华文的国际上的地位,间接推动友族学生学习华语,这有助于将华教问题变成全民问题,让发展华文转化为各族人民的共同意愿。

“当然有心人可能有其不可告人的幕后动机,但是,我认为总的方向是好的,我们要将坏念头变成好主意,将坏事变为好事。”

周世杨:华总不应逃避责任

黄汉良主张在当前的客观环境下,华教运动必须坚持以董教总为中心,团结一切可以团结的力量,配合全国华团和政党,尤其是朝野政党,共同维护华小不变质。

“坚持母语教育,反对数理英化、反对243方案,争取2008年小学检定考试数理科保留母语出题。”

另外,他也提出华教运动的3项任务,既以学生的利益为依归,不断改革创新、以家长的意愿为取向、全球化、国际化的思维作指导,跨越国界、跨越地区的思维来看待我国的华文教育。

周世杨强调,目前的华总领导层,以董教总的大方向为行事依归,在面对华社课题时,不逃避推搪责任,坚持与华社站在一起。他指出,在面对华社课题时,华团经常出现两极化的现象,对此,华总有责任凝聚华社的力量,拒绝政党的分化。他说,华总将继续凝聚华团的力量,扩大华团的阵容,有系统、策略地进行争取。

好几次周世杨忍不住批评马华,但是却欲言又止,惹得出席者阵阵笑声。

“董教总遭边缘化,但是身为华总很难指明道姓是谁,但大家都知道,华总又是需要保守点,希望大家体谅原谅。”“华团1年前已呈备忘录,为什么执政的马华和国大党现在才来争取?有一句话很传神,但是不能讲,什么当,什么家的。”

讲座获得超过200位出席者的捧场,挤爆隆雪华堂的视听室,一些出席者被迫在视听室外,通过主办当局准备的投影机观看主讲人的风采。

行动党秘书长林冠英也在致开幕词时,揭露教育部长希山慕丁和马华总会长日前所公布的布特拉高原敦陈修信华小,实际上是一所宏愿学校。

Comments on " Unstated BN policy- no more new Chi/Tamil schools"

My statement entitled "Unstated BN policy- No more new Chinese/ Tamil schools" was published by Malaysia-Today.net and it has attracted two 2 comments so far .

I find the second comment in particular contains some highly relevant points and full of optimism. And certain proposed ideas were controversial but certainly mind-provoking.What do you think?

2 Comments:

Don'tPlayGod said...
I have also heard from MCA friends that the MCA had agreed to UMNO's order that no new Chinese schools would be built more that 25 years ago! One can see that is true as no Chinese schools have been built for the last 35 years!

Just take a look at K.L/P.J. where the population has increased by lelaps and bounds, and so many housing areas have sprung up. UMNO's wish is that mother-tongue education is to be eventually removed in time.

Education is something that is very close to the hearts and minds of the Chinese. So MCA, please stop saying that you represent the Chinese community.
Friday, September 29, 2006 12:16:59 AM

Cinama said...
Education is the basic rights of a citizen. Responsible Government must provide it.

I am an advocator of "Muhibbah" and Bangsa Malaysia. I believed in "Unity in Diversity".

Imagine the Chinese in Malaysia attracting investors from China, exporting to China thru common bond. The Indian attracting FDI from India and selling to India e.g. Samy Velu (though an ass-hole) can get construction project from India under B.O.T. The Melayu can attract oil money from the Middle East and other muslim countries. Exporting Islamic banking, halal food and turn Malaysia into an Islamic Hub.

Negara Malaysia will be the envy of the Universe and the exchange rate will be RM1.00 = S$2.345.

The World scenario have changed. I think we should built more SRJK(c) and SRJK (t) and religious school for Muslim. At secondary level, all should integrated into a single SMK. The University should then accept students based on merit.

Common university entrance examination and no more matriculation for Melayu and STPM for non-Malay etc. No more discrimination. Maybe you can have just one university(govt funded) strictly for Melayu and see if there is a demand for their graduates.

LKY is RIGHT. The non- Melayu, although Malaysian, are marginalised and discriminated. This should be STOPPED.

RPK, You are right, the UMNO General Assembly (according to The Star) will be postponed until the next General Election.If the UMNO General Assembly were to be held, I am sure AAB will receive a NO CONFIDENT vote and ousted.

If the GE is held within the next six months, BN will be wiped off. If I have to, I will voted for a monkey instead of BN.
Friday, September 29, 2006 10:23:44 AM

不建新的华淡小,是国阵的既定政策

国阵的未明文既定政策-不建任何华/淡小

民主行动党全国中委兼非政府组织局主任刘天球文告,28/9/2006

从八十年代开始,国阵有一项既定的母语政策,那就是不兴建任何新的华小或淡小。

这是马华,民政,国大党和人联党部长不敢公开承认的事实,因为他们早就在内阁集体接受这项由巫统提出的政策。

唯有在极大的压力之下,通常是在大选或补选期间为了确保国阵胜利,国阵才会破例增建一两间华小或淡小。

鲁乃淡小就是一个很好的例子。为了赢取当地印度人选票,政府在补选期间答应建淡小,可是来得太迟和太少,结果国阵兵败如山倒。

另一个例子是培才二小。为了避免八打灵选民在2004年大选投票给民主行动党,国阵赶紧在万达镇兴建培才分校,过后还100%拨款兴建丽阳镇白小,结果取得大胜。

教育部长希山姆丁刚宣布的所谓两间新的华小,其中的古来二小其实不是新校。早在七年前就获得政府答应迁校的古来原本是大选糖果之一,后来迟迟不见踪影是因为第八大马计划没钱了(根据马华林时清的说词) 。
.

如今教育部长将它当作新的华小来宣布,简直是一派胡言,又骗得了谁呢?

所谓的布特拉高原敦陈修信华小,原本是属于在柔佛的一间宏愿学校,已经被林良实在上届大选之前(也是在大选的压力下)宣布取消,如今被部长拿来借尸还魂,当作新的华小。

需知布特拉高原是一个尚在兴建中的新镇,暂时尚未真正需要华小。

如果国阵政府真的有诚意发展母语教育,她应该先在已经兴建好的成熟新镇,如吉隆坡的旺沙马朱和雪州的双溪龙和皇冠镇新建华小和淡小。

因此,诺奥马其实说得是一项事实。他在国会回答行动党国会议员古拉说,在180间新校之中,没有任何一间是华小或淡小。他甚至强调,强化国小才是国阵政府的政策。

教育部长在内阁会议后的宣布其实是一片谎言。他甚至懒得欺骗印度社会(教育部长没有宣布兴建任何一间淡小,之前说会建14间淡小的三美威鲁应该作何自圆其说?)

我想只有好像黄家定那样的领袖,才会称赞教育部长英明。只是兴建两间不算新的“新校” ,值得那么高兴吗?又不是20间,200间!!!

若和第九大马计划的180间新校相比,那算得了什么?

若和董教总建议的134间华小相比,那又算的了什么?

对于已经被‘边缘化“的华人部长来说,你要怎么说呢?

或许,华社应该拒绝“乞丐” 式的“施舍” ,大声向政府说不!

五年才兴建两间实在太少,有本事“收回去”,宣布一间新的也不建,看看华裔选民如何看待这项“待遇” ,也好让还在“睡觉” 的同胞从梦中惊醒!

/刘天球

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Unstated BN policy- no new Chinese/Tamil schools

Unstated BN policy- no new Chinese/Tamil schools.

Media statement by Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, DAP CEC member and NGO bureau chief on Thursday, September 28, 2006 in Petaling Jaya

There was an unstated BN policy on mother-tongue education since the eighties, i.e. no more building of new Chinese and Tamil primary schools.

This is a fact MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP ministers would never dare to admit openly because they have agreed to it more than two decades ago.

New Chinese or Tamil schools could only be built when the BN government was under tremendous pressure, usually used as sugar-coated gimmicks for winning votes in general elections or by-elections.

One such good example was SJKT Lunas in Kedah. It was built to garner Indian votes for the Lunas by-election. Nevertheless, BN has lost the seat simply because it was too late and too little to win the hearts of the local Indian community at that time.

The other example was SJKC Pui Chai II in Bandar Utama, Petaling Jaya. It was built to prevent Chinese votes from switching to DAP in the 2004 general election. BN did very well here in spite of "killing" the original SJKC Damansara. Some 80 students are still putting up at the temple nearby to continue the struggle.

SJKC Kulai II, one of the so-called two new schools announced by Hisham yesterday, was in fact not a new school. It has gotten an approval seven years ago to be relocated as one of the election pledges.

It was not built until today because there was no more money under the 8th Malaysia Plan (according to Lim See Ching of MCA). And Hisham has shamelessly called it a new school!

And I suspect the so-called SJKC Tun Tan Siew Sin in Putra Heights was originally planned as a Vision School somewhere in Johor (which was called off and announced by Ling Liong Sik prior to the last general election).

Putra Heights is largely a new township still under construction. The demand for a SJKC would only come much later.

If the BN Government is really sincere and honest about promoting mother-tongue education, Hisham and company should be building new Chinese/ Tamil schools in matured townships like Wangsa Maju in Federal Territory and Bandar Sg Long and Bandar Mahkota Cheras in Selangor.

So, Noh Omar was correct when he answered M. Kula of DAP (MP of Ipoh Barat) that none of the 180 schools planned under the 9MP were Chinese or Tamil ones.

Hishammuddin Hussein’s response after the Cabinet meeting on Wednesday was nothing but lies. {Guess why Hisham did not even bother to lie about building any new Tamil schools, Komala ( and Samy Vellu?)}

Only people like Ong Ka Ting would praise Hisham for such a sham. How could he be so happy about the so-called two (not 20 or 200) ‘new schools” which were not “new” after all?

What is that compared to 180 new schools under the 9MP?

What is that compared to 134 Chinese schools that we need (according to DongJiaoZong’s proposal)?

But that’s the mentality of a ‘marginalized’ Minister as such. So sad.

YB Chew, what have you got to say to these two Malaysiakini readers?

The crime rate in PJ is climbing up rapidly just like any other urban towns. But all the elected reps like Chew Mei Fun of PJ Utara could do was to hold PR dialogues with residents and police force.

They were not bothered with the fact that only about 7,000 out of 92,000 police personnels were actually involved in combating crimes.

Neither do they care about the setting up of IPCMC or police reforms.

Chew, who lives in gated properties like Aman Suria, has been advocating for gated communities as a "solution".

She even abused her position by asking the PJ police to send patrol cars right into where she's staying, and to patrol "within the gated community"!!!

Two Malaysiakini readers have written letters to the Editor to express their disappointment with Chew. Just wondering whether she would bother to respond to their queries.

Letter 1: Safe in her little enclave M Chang Sep 26, 06 6:05pm

With regard to the article in The Star titled Chew is all for gated communities, I have to say that the MP for Petaling Jaya Utara, Chew Mei Fun, has demonstrated that she is not only oblivious to the real issues of the day, but her opinions are naïve, condescending and insensitive, to say the least.

Is she advocating that we all move to gated communities – which are basically enclaves for the wealthy - just so we can feel safer.

Shouldn't we, as taxpayers, be able to rely on the police to keep our country safe for all Malaysians?

Isn't she just as concerned as the rest of us that her government (I didn't vote for BN) hasn't really got a concrete plan to reduce crime and corruption in this country?

Not only does she not say much in Parliament, she doesn't seem to have a stand in matters that are of concern to the people.

We have hardly heard her opinions on PJ issues, such as the billboard issue, the pest control issue (when it was raging), the increase in assessment rates, etc.

And what, pray tell, YB, is your stand on the IPCMC?

Letter 2: Gated community: How many can afford its lifestyle? YY Sep 27, 06 6:36pm

When member of parliament and Women, Family and Community Development parliamentary secretary Chew Mei Fun, a victim of snatch theft and burglary, openly declared that “I was scared”, many would have identified with her situation.

Here at last was a voice in the government that would be calling for steps to be taken to make the streets and neighbourhood safer for all.

Would she press the government for increased police patrols, for example?

What Chew advocated was, alas, a disappointment. It is true that gated communities and condominiums, being private properties with restricted access, do provide a greater measure of security.

However, such safety comes at a cost. It is not only the private security services that have to be paid for. When street lights don’t work or if potholes appear in the streets inside of the community gates, the bills for repair and maintenance go to the residents. Hence, here is no such thing as a ‘cheap’ gated community that can be well-run.

I have nothing against those who can afford the lifestyle gated communities offer. If they have worked hard to achieve success in life, let them taste the fruit of their labour.

But we have to accept that most Malaysians will not be among this group. There are also the existing non-gated properties, where the overwhelming majority of the population live, to consider.

Will personal safety and security then be available only to those who can afford it? Should not ordinary folk living outside the high walls of exclusive gated communities expect good neighbourhood security to be provided by the police?

Chew can look forward to feeling even safer before long. The up-and-coming parliamentary secretary is only a few steps away from becoming a minister, at which time she would be assigned her own personal bodyguard.

Until the streets are made safer, the rest of us (we, too, are scared) who can afford neither gated communities nor personal bodyguards will just have to take our chances.

笑一笑, 没烦恼!

某华商发明了一种智商测试仪,献给马华公会。

陈广才来试一试,把头脑往里面一伸。机器说 [ 智商 70 ] , 陈广才很高兴。翁诗傑也把脑袋放到里面。机器说 [ 智商 75 ] 翁诗傑也很高兴。黄XX看见大家这麽高兴, 也来试一试 , 把脑袋往里面一伸。机器说:[ 机器珍贵,要小心使用。。请不要把狗头往里面放啊"。

事件发生後,华商急忙升级,很快推出改良2号版。

陈广才又来试一试,机器说 [ 智商 75 ] ,广才大呼[ 长了 5分 ]。翁诗傑见到了,也来试一试 , 机器说 [ 智商 80 ] , 诗傑大喜。黄XX看到了, 心想这次应该没问题了 , 也来试一试 。机器良久不说话"。

正当大家以为机器有问题的时候,机器说, [ 哦。。。!这粒狗头好面熟啊!]连续 2 次让总会长出醜,华商立刻高薪聘请美国专家,使用最新的技术,进行全面升级。

经过300位专家的努力 , 终於推出了升级 3号版。"。

陈广才又来试一试, 机器说 [ 智商 80 ]。广才大叫[ 这次测得更準啊! ]。翁诗傑也来试一试, 机器说 [ 智商 85 ]。诗傑大喊[ 这次真的测得更準呀! ]大家很高兴,马上叫黄XX也来试一试。

黄XX这回学乖了。他捉了一只狗往里面放,要看机器有什么反应。

机器良久不说话,正当大家以为机器又有问题的时候,突然大家听到一阵阵
[ 咚 咚 咚 咚锵咚锵 咚锵! ] 的锣鼓声,大家吓了一跳。接着,只见机器打出几个大字:

[ 欢迎总会长光临, 多多指教!]

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Lessons for corrupt politicians back home

Thaksin Shinawatra lost his power in a recent coup detat. But what has really triggered his downfall in disgrace?

It's greed and corruption.

Thaksin was already a telecommunication business tycoon before he becomes the numero uno of Thailand.

He should not (and need not) have used his power and position to enrich himself any further.

But he did. And he has done it to a level which the interest of the entire country was at stake.

That has angered the people of Thailand.

The opposition parties capitalised on these sentiments. They have joined forces to boycott Thaksin.

Thaksin might have won the elections but he has lost the faith of many more Thais.

And the King was not happy at all.

There is a need to save Thailand from going to the dogs.

The General must have felt that a coup is what Thailand needed at the moment.

And the General's action seems to go down well with the Thais in general.

Even the rest of the world watched the coup in cool.

The action was, of course, undemocratic.

Because it was not through the ballot box.

We only hope that the soldiers would withdraw as soon as possible and return the power to a new democratically elected government.

There is a nice article in The Nation today. Readers may find some similarities 'terribly similar' between Bangkok and Putrajaya.

I hope our PM and his Cabinet members would also read the article and learn a lesson or two from Thaksin. Happy reading!

Thaksin's Family network

Chulalongkorn professor lectured last year on how he used his power to build up Shin Corp and other family businesses. The Nation.Sep 27, 2006

An extensive study by a Chulalongkorn University economy lecturer gave what could be a complete picture of the extensive business empire of the Shinawatra family.

Phasuk Pongphaichit, the lecturer, gave this lecture on money politics in a seminar held by Economic Politics Centre of Chulalongkorn late last year - before the recent military coup that ousted him.

The new government is investigating into possible corruption and, if found, confiscation of the Thaksin assets.

Her study has found that Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra had created wealth for himself, his relatives and his political affiliates during the past five years by practicing corruption in the policy level.
It includes granting business privileges, reducing taxes and concession fees for his affiliates and getting rid of business rivals as well as trading national interest with their groups' business interest.

They also set up firms to bid and win state projects and use the stock market as tools to increase the values of their firms.

Excerpts of her lecture:

Since Thaksin took office as prime minister in 2001, his government issued several economic policies, which directly benefited listed firms with close connections to the prime minister and Cabinet members.

The policies also benefited and protected businesses of the politicians and their affiliations. Such policies included tax privileges, deduction of concession fees, blocking new business rivals to enter market, and delaying policies, which could affect businesses of the Thaksin network.

Businesses, which are taking part in the operation to eat up the country in all possible means, include businesses belonging to Shinawatra family and relatives, Mahakijsiri family, Jungrungreangkit family, Maleenon family, Chearavanon family, and Asavabhokin family. All of the families are on the top list of richest families in Thailand.

Shin Corp receives a lot of benefits

During the past over five years, the Thaksin government issued several policies and measures to benefit and protect telecom businesses of Shin Corp in several cases:

First, the issuance of excise decree on telecom businesses was a tool to protect the businesses of Advanced Info Services and other firms in the same type of businesses from competitions. That is, the decree requires new operators to pay the excise taxes in full while current telecom operators can deduct their concession fees from the amount of excise taxes they have to pay. The question is which law the government invoked to exempt the current telecom operators from having to pay excise taxes in full.

Second, the government allowed AIS to deduce the expenses of roaming services before sharing its revenue with the state. This allowed AIS to share less revenue with the state. AIS was also benefited from the amendment of its contract with the TOT Plc by allowing AIS to pay only 20 per cent of its revenue from prepaid phone services instead of 25 per cent to TOT. All of these caused the state to lose its revenue by over Bt1.6 billion. AIS also benefited from the reduction of import tariff on mobile phones from 10 per cent to 0 per cent. The government cited regulations of the World Trade Organisation to provide the tax reduction. Moreover, the government amended its regulations to allow permanent officials from C8 to C11 to reimburse their phone expenses up to Bt4,000 a month, compared with Bt1,000 in the past. There are about 40,000 officials who enjoy the benefit.

Third, the exemption of Shin Satellite from paying taxes on its revenue worth Bt16.349 billion generated from its foreign customers of its IP Star satellite was unjustifiable. This is because the exemption did not lead to any investment in Thailand and Thai people did not receive any benefit. Only the foreign customers and shareholders of Shin Satellite received the benefits.

Fourth, the government transferred the business risks of Shin Satellite from the firm to the Finance Ministry by having the Export-Import Bank of Thailand grant a 12-year-term soft loan of Bt4 billion to the Burmese government. The loan was used by the Burmese Post and Telecom Ministry of Burma to buy telecom equipment to link with IP Star to use the satellite's services to provide mobile phone and broadband Internet services. The government had the Finance Ministry guarantee the loan of the Ex-im Bank, instead of Shin Satellite.

Fifth, the Thaksin government tried to protect its telecom businesses by not opening up the telecom industry in the country. Instead, it opened up other sectors in exchange for liberalization of services which would benefit businesses of government politicians. An example could be seen in the free trade agreement between Thailand and Australia. The Thaksin government opened up the cattle indusry in Thailand in exchange for telecom and auto spare parts industries in Australia. This allowed Shin Satellite and businesses of the Jungrungreangkit family to benefit at the harship of Thai cattle farmers.IP Star will also benefit from FTA agreements with India and China. Analysts of the Stock Exchange of Thailand said Shin Satellite's revenues would tremendously increase once India and China use transponders of IP Star. It was expected that IP Star's service fees from the two countries would be worth about Bt15 billion.

Sixth, the government helped Tele Info Media, which changed name from Shinawatra Directories, to increase its business chances from phone number inquiry services by exempting from contract's requirement to print White Pages phone books.

Seventh, the Thaksin government helped AIS and Shin Satellite by failing to enact a competition act to prevent monopoly and regulate merger.

Eighth, after Shin Corp held stakes in iTV, the television was allowed to pay much less concession fee or only Bt150 million per year for 20 years. This caused the sate to lose its revenue for Bt17.43 billion. The government also allowed iTV to change its programme content to have more entertainment programmes than news and documentary programmes, and thus allowing it to have more income from commercial advertisement.

Ninth, the government's open sky policy allowed Shin Corp to invest in Air Asia, which is a low-cost airline. The government allowed Air Asia to open new domestic and international routes in overlapping of the routes o Thai Airways International. This allowed Air Asia to see income growth worth Bt3 billion at the end of 2005, compared with the shrinking income of THAI. THAI reduced its domestic and international flights and cancelled some of its route although the routes were profitable for the airline, amid allegations that it was forced by the government to make way for Air Asia.

Tenth, the government launched real estate development projects to benefit daughter companies of Shin Corp. For example, the Bangkok Boulevard project of SC Assets Plc on Ram Intra-Ring Road-Navamin roads benefited from the a Cabinet resolution on July 4 2003 to cut a new road from Ratchadapisek to Ram Intra at the kilometre marker No 4.5 The new road immediately increased the value of the plot of SC Assets, turning it from a plot with no access to a golden plot.--

It is known that Pojaman Shinawatra, the wife of Thaksin, likes to buy up land. Moreover, she managed to buy land at cheap prices. For example, she bought a 33-rai plot opposite from the Korean embassy near Thailand's Cultural Centre from the Thai Assets Management Corporation at the price 50 cheaper than its market price.

This caused the state to lose Bt715 million from what it should have received for the land price. The plot was sold at the price Bt700 million lower than the price offered in the first round of bidding and the government did not received land transfer fee worth Bt15 million.

She also owns Alpine Golf Course worth Bt747million, which Thaksin bought at very low price amid allegations that he cheated a temple out of the plot.

Moreover, Shin Corp also expanded its business to personal finance business by setting the Capital OK and providing personal loans. The firm uses customer database of AIS and obtains fund from DBS Singapore.

Thaksin's son, Panthongtae Shinawatra, also set up an advertisement agency to take up a Bt90 million-worth concession in the compound of subway system.

Members of Shinawatra-Wongsawat families expand businesses to take all

Thaksin's close relative, who became rich overnight, included his sister, Yaowapha Wongsawat. She set up M Link or M Link Asian Corporation Plc, which is a main business of her family. The firm generated annual revenue worth several billions of baht for the Wongsawat family.

M Link has expanded its businesses by buying stakes in several firms, and thus allowing the Wongsawat family to expand its business empire to other businesses on top of mobile phone selling business. Key firms, whose major shares had been bought by the Wongsawat family, are companies which compete for government projects.

Cut for brevity. For full report visit:
http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/09/26/politics/politics_30014674.php

Nazri, the ball is now in your court.


In the forum organised by DAP two weeks ago, Nazri has siad that he was not convinced that there were sufficient reasons to review the 1988 judiaciary crisis and he wanted new evidence before he could raise the issue in the Cabinet.

And now Tun Salleh Abbas has answered Nazri Aziz with his 5-point letter...

[Malaysia Today] [News & Commentaries] Salleh pleads his case


Former Lord President Tun Salleh Abas today (Sept 26, 2006) responded to a Cabinet Minister's recent call for new and important facts to emerge to justify a review of the 1988 judicial crisis.

In a five-page statement, Salleh rebutted Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz's argument for not agreeing to a review, and touched on five incidents which should trigger a review.

Nazri's argument: That he did not agree to the review because the decision of the two tribunals which decided on Salleh and his five colleagues were accepted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the government in 1988.

Salleh's rebuttal: According to the Federal Constitution, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as a constitutional monarch is not even allowed to refuse advice tendered by the Cabinet or the Prime Minister. No emphasis need be placed on such an acceptance.

The five incidents that Salleh referred to in his statement have been touched on or discussed in his 1990 book 'May Day for Justice'. Since he never appeared before the tribunal that tried him, they are in effect "new facts".

The incidents are:

His short meeting with then Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr (now Tun) Mahathir Mohamad on May 27, 1988, when he was asked to step down for being biased in the discharge of his judicial duties;

A visit on the same day by a very important officer of the government who offered an appointment to a lucrative post in an Islamic bank in Jeddah if he resigned;

On June 24 1988, a month after his suspension as Lord President, he was summoned to an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong where he was to ask for forgiveness for a letter he wrote to him regarding the judiciary and the executive. That mission failed because of the intervention of two senior government officers;

The suspension of his colleagues with the eventual dismissal of two of them. This was engineered for the purpose of thwarting them from hearing Salleh's judicial review application challenging the legality and constitutionality of his suspension and the composition of the tribunal to deal with his dismissal; and

The government's action to deprive the Rulers of their immunities.

Salleh referred to a discussion he had with the Sultan of Johor who was the Yang di-Pertuan Agong at the time of his dismissal.

Read on for more:

Former Lord President Tun Salleh Abas today responded to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz's statement regarding a proposal to review the 1988 Judicial Crisis.

Salleh thanked Nazri for agreeing to the review of that dark day in judicial history if "new and important facts" emerge.He said Nazri has also not agreed to the review because the decision of the two tribunals - the first tribunal which decided on Salleh and the second tribunal which decided on his five other colleagues - were accepted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Government in 1988.

Salleh said Nazri seems to place great reliance on the fact that acceptance of the recommendations by both tribunals were also accepted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

He said according to Article 40(1) of the Federal Constitution, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as a Constitutional Monarch must act "in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or a Minister acting under the general authority of the Cabinet, except as provided by this Constitution."

"Thus, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is not even allowed to refuse advice tendered by the Cabinet or the Prime Minister."

This is further provided in Article 66(4)(a) where the Yang di-Pertuan Agong cannot refuse to assent to a bill passed by Parliament. He is given three months within which to assent to the bill. If he fails to do so, the government is free to gazette the bill into law."

The history of this country has shown that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has never acted against the wishes of the Prime Minister or the Cabinet including on the issue of depriving the Rulers of their own immunity."There is therefore no way for the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to refuse consent to accept to the recommendations of the two tribunals when they were submitted to His Majesty."

The government's action to deprive the Rulers of their immunities.

"In my view, no emphasis need therefore be placed on the acceptance of the recommendations of the two Tribunals by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, since in the light of the constitutional provisions and practice, His Majesty's powers have become, with respects, almost procedural and reflect the wishes of His Majesty's Government, even if the Prime Minister of the day is dictatorial."

Salleh said as for the call for "new and important facts" to trigger a review, these should be presented to a tribunal or commission charged to investigate the matter, should the government decide to do so.He said since Nazri has placed this as a condition for agreeing to a review, he has decided to touch on five incidents only in general terms.

FIRST INCIDENT:The first incident relates to my meeting with the then Prime Minister in his office on Friday 27th May 1988 in the presence of the then Deputy Prime Minister and the then Chief Secretary to the Government. I was asked by the then Prime Minister to step down because I was accused of being biased in the discharge of my judicial duties. My understanding of this accusation was that it must have been connected with the impending Umno 11 case when I decided to establish a nine-member panel of the Supreme Court to hear the appeal. I strongly denied the accusation and told him that I was not prepared to resign. Then he threatened to dismiss me by instituting a tribunal under the Constitution. I told him I was prepared to be dismissed rather than leave the judicial office under a cloud. This was a very short meeting and after I had left the Prime Minister's office and returned to my chambers, I immediately wrote by way of an aide memoir a note of what had transpired during that meeting. That note coincidentally appears in the latest issue of Aliran.

SECOND INCIDENT:The second incident relates to the visit to me on the same day of a messenger who was a very important officer of the Government. He came with the idea of persuading me to resign or go on long leave and at the same time threatening me with dismissal should I choose not to. Were I to resign, I would be appointed to a lucrative job in Jeddah as a director of Islamic Bank with a high salary I could never have dreamed of, coupled with an unlimited amount of entertainment allowances and travelling expenses. The officer said he had been authorised to pass this message to me by a very important Minister. When I told him I could not accept the offer, I was then threatened with dismissal and the ignominy of having to face a tribunal. My answer to the messenger was the same as I had given to the Prime Minister earlier on in the day."

THIRD INCIDENT:The third incident took place on 24th June 1988, almost a month after my suspension as Lord President when two benevolent messengers arrived at my home to tell me that some Malay Rulers then gathered at Istana Kelantan at Jalan Kia Peng and wanted to see me. Post haste, I made my appearance before Their Royal Highnesses. I was informed that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (HRH the Sultan of Johor) had just left the meeting. Taking the lead upon my appearance was HRH the then Raja of Perlis and also present were the other Malay Rulers or their representatives. (The Sultans of Kedah and Selangor were away abroad and the Sultan of Pahang was unable to attend on account of the serious illness of his then Consort who in fact passed away the following day). I was informed by HRH the late Raja of Perlis that agreement was reached between the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers then present that should I tender my apologies to and ask forgiveness from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for writing my impugned letter to His Majesty at His Majesty\'s Istana Bukit Serene in Johor Baru, my suspension would be lifted and the matter would end there. I was to travel to Istana Bukit Serene with my chief counsel, Yang Mulia Raja Aziz Addruse. Since we could not get seats on the plane, I decided to travel to Johor Baru by car whilst Yang Mulia Raja Aziz chartered a private aircraft for that purpose. Upon my arrival in Johor Baru, I was admitted into the Istana but Yang Mulia Raja Aziz, despite all the trouble he took to charter the plane, could get only as far as the gates of the Istana as he was prevented from entering the palace. At the Istana, contrary to my expectation, my mission was a failure because the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had earlier been briefed by two very senior government officers from Kuala Lumpur not to forgive me for the wrong I had committed.

FOURTH INCIDENT:The fourth incident relates to the suspension of my colleagues with the eventual dismissal of two of them. The suspension was engineered for the purpose of thwarting them from hearing my judicial review application challenging the legality and constitutionality of my suspension and the composition of the tribunal to deal with my dismissal. A particular High Court judge who was reluctant to hear my application feigned illness on the day fixed for hearing. His replacement did his utmost to delay hearing my application and when he finally did so, my application was dismissed. I appealed to the Supreme Court and succeeded. An Order of the Court must always be sealed before it is served on the respondent. The Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court was the keeper of its seal but when I succeeded in my appeal, the seal could not be found as it was purposely hidden. However, after a search by the late Tan Sri Wan Suleiman, the seal was discovered. The sealed copy of the Order had then to be served on the respondent tribunal which was located at Parliament House. But when my counsel Raja Aziz Addruse attempted to effect service of the Order on the respondent, he found that the authorities had ordered the Parliament gates closed. However at the request by the late Tan Sri Wan Suleiman for assistance from the office of the IGP (Inspector-General of Police), the gates were opened and the Order was served. Despite receipt of the Order, the Tribunal proceeded with its deliberation. The end result of this incident was that upon my refusal to recognise the composition of the Tribunal, especially with regards to the appointment of its chairman on grounds of a serious breach of natural justice, I was, in my absence, adjudged guilty and subsequently dismissed. The five Supreme Court judges which allowed my application were themselves suspended. Another Tribunal was established to try them and two of these valiant judges, namely the late Tan Sri Wan Suleiman and Datuk George Seah were dismissed. The other three, namely the Tan Sri Eusoffee Abdoolcader, Tan Sri Azmi Kamaruddin and Tan Sri Wan Hamzah were reinstated. If the Supreme Court Order were obeyed, my reinstatement would have automatically followed and this would have been unacceptable not only to the government of the day but also to those who would benefit from my dismissal. Thus my five colleagues were innocently suspended with all the consequences that have adversely affected them and their families until this day."


FIFTH INCIDENT:The fifth incident relates to the government's action to deprive the Rulers of their immunities. The late Tun Suffian and I acted as advisors to the Rulers. By then, the Sultan of Johor was no longer the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and His Royal Highness was very concerned about the government's intention. This was my first audience with His Royal Highness after my dismissal. HRH said to me in no uncertain terms that he very much regretted what had happened to me as he said he then realised that he had been "made use of." I told HRH that there was no need to feel sorry for me personally but he should express his regrets and apology to the people of this country for losing a Judiciary that was independent and could look after their rights. I was later summoned again by HRH to Istana Bukit Serene for advice after HRH learned that a bill had already been introduced in Parliament to disband the Johor Military Force (JMF). My advice to HRH was that the JMF, which was established long before the Malay Regiment, was and is part of the privileges of the Sultan of Johor and, without the consent of His Royal Highness, such privileges could not legally be withdrawn. My opinion was confirmed by Mr Neil Lawson, Q.C., the legal adviser to the Malay Rulers during the negotiation for Merdeka. There was no doubt that HRH was very pleased with my effort over HRH's then predicament and, in appreciation thereof, offered to make a public apology in Johor Baru over HRH's role in my dismissal. The Johor Palace then began to put in place arrangements for the occasion but, once again, mightier hands from Kuala Lumpur managed to persuade HRH from keeping to his pledge.The above are some of the new facts which I hope could persuade Nazri to change his mind. These incidents undeniably go to show that come what may, I must be made to give up my judicial office. There would of course be other incidents and other details which would emerge if the review is held but for the time being, I shall keep the identity of those unnamed persons in this statement concealed. As regards responses from the other two judges who were also dismissed, Tan Sri Wan Suleiman is no longer with us. His widow, has nevertheless, supported the call for a review. But the speech made by the late Tun Suffian (Hashim) during a special reference organised by the Malaysian Bar in Tan Sri Wan Suleiman's memory and honour should give an indication on the role played by my late colleague during the crisis which, in the learned Tun Suffian's opinion, certainly did not deserve his dismissal. Datuk George Seah is currently unwell to make any contribution to Nazri's call for "new facts" but the series of articles on the crisis written by him not so long ago continue to appear in the websites of both the Malaysian Bar and Aliran. Knowing the character of the late Tan Sri Eusoffee Abdoolcader, I am sure that he too would support a review. Tan Sri Azmi Kamaruddin has already come out publicly for a review. I believe Tan Sri Wan Hamzah is also of this view.

For these reasons, I hope Nazri will present the proposal to the Cabinet for a review of the 1988 Judicial Crisis so that the truth of this important episode in our nation's history is uncovered. --

Posted by Raja Petra Kamarudin to News & Commentaries at 9/26/2006 10:07:00 PM

Malaysia Todayhttp://www.malaysia-today.net/index.html

That's Samy Vellu for you!

In my media statement yesterday, I liberally predicted that Samy Vellu would not apologise for his mistakes (he madea false claim that 21 Tamil schools were built over the last 5 years) and he would argue that "new school buildings were as good as or equavalent to new schools".

True enough! In his rebuttal to Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang, he actually said that "when we rebuild, they become new schools"! Hahaha...

Anyway, do you still remember what he said prior to the Lunas by-election? He said that he will not return to Kuala Lumpur if Barisan Nasional loses its seat in Lunas, Kedah. When the opposition managed to block some 20 buses of phantom voters on the polling day and eventually wrested the seat from MIC, he just pretended that he has never said such a thing.

Shame on you, Samy Vellu!

Here's an extract from a Malaysiakini report...

Rebuilt schools are new schools

Reacting to this today, Samy Vellu said that Lim was just trying to harp on the issue unnecessarily.

“He (Lim) is trying to poke to get more information he could harp on unnecessarily. Why should I give him the list of new schools ... let him go find it himself,” said Samy Vellu.

Samy Vellu also rejected claims that the 21 schools were not newly built. “There are new schools. When people relocate, we have to build a new school. Although it is replacing an older school, it is still a new school.

“We have more than 500 Tamil schools in the country and out of these more than 100 schools need to be rebuilt. When we rebuild, they become new schools,” he said.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Shame on you, Samy Vellu!



An education ministry official who has chosen to remain anonymous has told The China Press yesterday (Monday, September 25, 2006) that the claim made by the MIC President was incorrect.

In fact, not even a single Tamil school was built under the 8th Malaysia Plan and it is very unlikely that any new Tamil school will be built under the 9th Malaysia Plan.

The official also explained that the so-called new schools were merely new school buildings constructed within the existing Tamil schools.

Samy Vellu has earlier “proudly” announced that a total of 21 new Tamil schools were built over the last five years and he is now asking for another 14 new ones to be built over the next 5 years.

Samy’s statement also “stunned” the MCA leaders because they were unable to persuade the Barisan Nasional Government to build any new schools except for moving or replacing those schools that were shut down because of poor or no intake. To MCA, one Chinese school must ‘die’ before a new one could be built.

Samy has made this announcement in response to Nor Omar, the deputy Education Minister who disclosed that none of the 180 new schools being planned under the 9MP were Tamil or Chinese one.

(Incidentally, Nor Omar’s announcement has ironically testified the claim made by Minister Mentor of Singapore, that the Chinese in Malaysia were marginalized systematically by the Government).

Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang has since challenged Samy to prove his claim as Lim was very sure that there was no truth in his announcement.

Lim has even publicly stated that he is prepared to say sorry to Samy if Samy could prove his claim.

Now that Samy was caught lying, would he be bold enough to admit his mistake and apologize to the Indian community in particular and to the Malaysian public in general?

Knowing Samy’s character, he would rather argue that new school buildings are as good as or equivalent to new schools!?

On the other hand, the Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang has decided to register a protest by moving an unprecedented motion in the coming Parliamentary session in November 2006 to cut the pay of the Education Minister, his two deputies and also the Parliamentary Secretary by RM10.

Lim has also decided to hold a roundtable in the Parliament in early October to discuss the matter. He calls on the civil society throughout the country, associations, educational bodies or school boards, to come forward to make their voices heard.

DAP MP for Bukit Mertajam, Chong Eng, who is the DAP parliamentary spokesperson on education, will be the coordinator for this Parliamentary Roundtable.

Lim hopes that all political parties, in particular MPs and leaders from MCA, Gerakan, MIC and SUPP, as well as Umno, will participate fully in the roundtable.

Anyone who is interested in participating in the Parliamentary Roundtable can also contact Chong Eng.


(Media statement by Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, DAP CEC member and NGO Bureau Chief on Tuesday, September 26, 2006 in Petaling Jaya )

Monday, September 25, 2006

Happy Ramadan to all my Muslim friends!



Ramadan, the month of fasting for Muslims all over the world, has just begun yesterday.

I wish all my Muslim freinds a happy and meaningful Ramadan.

It has has been said that all religions is one.

A good friend of mine, who is a Buddhist for some years now, opines that "A good Muslim is at the same time a good Christian/Buddhist/Hindu/ Sikh/Jew/Taoist...". And I agree with him.

In a multireligious society like ours, we must learn to respect all other religions practised and followed by our brothers and sisters of other faiths.

No one (including the politicians) should make use of religion for selfish gain or to serve his or her personal agenda.

And freedom of religion must include the freedom to join and the freedom to leave any religion. Merely leaving a religion must not be construed as a traitor of that religion.

Salam sejahtera!

Chong King Liong-A Man of Action


走好,张景良先生!

隆雪華堂聯辦追思會逾百人追思張景良
中国报CHINA PRESS (吉隆坡24日訊)

逾150名華社團領袖、華教人士、在野黨領袖及公眾,今日出席“張景良先生追思會”。

追思會是由隆雪華堂、留台聯總、台大校友會及華社研究中心聯辦。

出席者包括隆雪華堂會長拿督黃漢良、大馬留台聯總會長劉天吉、國立台灣大學大馬校友會會長陳丹生、華社研究中心董事主席林忠強、大馬校友會聯總會長周素英、董教總代表、大馬工程師協會主席林富佐、中國駐馬大使館參贊申永先、孝恩集團主席朱林秀琴、民主行動黨領袖陳勝堯、方貴倫和劉天球等人。

呼籲發揚死者精神
張景良家屬也在場。追思會于上午11時開始,全場肅立默哀3分鐘。爾后,大會播放張景良生平事跡投景簡介以及宣讀追悼文。

張景良于今年9月8日與世長辭,其辭世不僅是其家屬親友的損失,也是留台聯校友會,乃至是整個華社的重大損失。

張氏生前是留台聯總的重要奠基人之一,當年不論在籌組留台聯總或籌建留台聯總大廈等重要大事上,都積極參與其盛,而且扮演著舉足輕重角色,對留台聯總的卓著貢獻是所有留台人都應感恩載德、永遠銘記在心的。

張景良從1970年代初期,便全心投入華團華教行列。30多年來身體力行、鞠躬盡瘁,成果影響深遠。

林忠強致詞時說,張景良不幸與世長辭,紀念死者最好的辦法,就是學習和發揚死者的精神。
“我們要學習張先生一生勤奮,為社會服務,公而忘私的精神。我們要學習他作為專業人士,實事求是,身體力行的奉獻精神。我們也要學習他平易近人,虛懷若谷,光明磊落的作風。”

此外,陳丹生表示,邱祥熾贊美張先生是“A man of action,意即行動的巨人”,他雖不善于出點子,但一有良好建議,必坐言起行,以祇于成。這與他推崇“知行合一”孫文學說的思想不謀而合。

此外,聯辦團體、友好團體、張景良遺孀盧秋菊及公眾獻花,祝福張先生在天之靈永遠安息。

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Kuan Yew is correct to say that Chinese were marginalized in Malaysia


劉天球:政府應承認事實

CHINA PRESS (吉隆坡23日訊)

民主行動黨非政府組織局主任劉天球今日表示,在新經濟政策下,大馬非巫裔族群確實被邊緣化,更甚于政經文教及其他領域。

他說,這並非民政黨主席拿督斯里林敬益,所指大馬華裔沒被邊緣化的說法。

他補充,林敬益于週五反駁新加坡前總理李光耀的言論,指大馬華裔沒被邊緣化,但沒提出很好的理由。

他表示,最近,新經濟政策借屍還魂,被抬出桌面。第9大馬計劃強調上述政策,這樣一來,大馬華裔繼續被邊緣化。

劉天球在記者會披露,最近發生巫青要求檳州首長輪任制,以及甲洞國會選區改由馬華候選人上陣問題,顯示民政黨在國陣大家庭內也被邊緣化。

“從我國獨立迄今,國內不曾有非馬來人擔任政府大學副校長職,或警察總長或三軍總司令,難道非馬來族群沒有資格嗎?”

針對李光耀指出我國華裔與印尼華人一樣,面對被邊緣化問題,劉天球說,政府應該承認事實,逐步糾正。

他認為,國家領袖必須嚴正看待此事,以馬來西亞人為優先,不是種族性的看待問題。

“為了阻止非馬來人被邊緣化,大馬政府應該取消新經濟政策。”

Zaid Ibrahim-the maverick in UMNO



In my mind, Kota Bharu MP Zaid Ibrahim is a maverick in UMNO. He was suspended as the division chief of UMNO Kota Bharu for an allegation he denied vehemently.

He first caught my attention when he took part in a roundtable organised by the Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang on the issue of freedom of religion immediately after the Moorthy "body snatch" tragedy.

He impressed me further when he took the challenge to speak in a forum on the same issue organised by Article 11 in Petaling Jaya. He spoke freely as a good Muslim in the forum, drawing much appreciation from the attentive crowd.

And recently, he spoke in the Parliament without fear on the need of political reform in the country, expressing his great disappointment with the Abdullah administration. He even warned the BN Government of the consequences of failing the rakyat.

He was interviewed by NST and here's the full story...


‘I speak because I believe in his vision’

New Straits Times

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim raised eyebrows recently when he stood in Parliament and said that the government’s reform agenda had slowed to a halt. KOH LAY CHIN speaks to him about his provocative view while Tangga Batu MP Datuk Idris Haron tells her why patience is a virtue.

Q: You have said publicly that the prime minister has yet to make real reforms. What do you mean?

A: The prime minister put forth a historic and paradigm moving manifesto in the 2004 elections. He promised difficult but urgently needed reforms in the government and judiciary. He promised to fight against corruption, restoring integrity in the government, transparency and accountability.He spoke the language of change the people had waited for so long. And he got the biggest mandate from the people to govern.

When I said he failed to push reforms, I was saying that he had failed to get his ministers, the Chief Ministers and the civil servants with him on these issues. That’s why I said in Parliament that he must be prepared to do radical things, including getting the right people to perform the tasks.

Q: It would seem that for you it’s more of a problem of the PM’s "executioners" or his "team".

A: The prime minister is only as good as the Cabinet he assembles. It’s quite common for the PM in other jurisdictions to reshuffle and change his Cabinet whenever he feels necessary for executing policies the government has undertaken.I get the impression that the reason our Cabinet is so large was because the PM wants to be nice to Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad by retaining those appointed by Dr Mahathir.Did it appease Dr Mahathir? Not at all. Being nice in this way is not necessarily a good thing. Would Pak Lah cause political instability if he were to undertake radical Cabinet change? Not at all.

Q: In your speech in Parliament, you commented on the openness in the system under the PM.

A: In my speech, I said the openness that we have in our society today is entirely due to Pak Lah’s sense of trust and tolerance, a much desired trait in our leader.But openness must have purpose and if not managed properly will only fester discontent.

Openness in the government means we must be prepared to amend the Official Secrets Act so that people will not use the Act to hide acts of corruption or incompetence.

Openness means all contracts must be by open tender save for certain legitimate exceptions and not the other way around.

Openness means sensitive matters are dealt with intelligently and objectively and not to resort to the closed-door bargaining style of the past.

The prime minister cannot do all these alone, he needs a team. As to my suggestion for the undoing of the Dr Mahathir years, I did not mean to suggest that Dr Mahathir did nothing good. In fact he built Malaysia as a modern state with all the infrastructure and facilities.

The undoing of Mahathirism is the doing away with authoritarianism, with lack of accountability and the absence of the rule of law.

I believe the country will be better placed for the 21st century if the policies of human capital development, of transparency and accountability under the present PM are implemented. More so if the judiciary is fully empowered, and Parliament becomes a chamber fully accessible for the rakyat to see, watch and learn.

Q: Before Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took over from Dr Mahathir, you said in an interview that you felt "reassured" because the person who was about to lead the country was a profound thinker and thought things through.

A: In an interview three years ago I said that I believed Pak Lah is man of integrity, and will be considerate in his dealings on all matters. Have I changed my mind about him? No. I want him to succeed for the sake of all. There are delicate issues that we face as a nation and we need a leader who is fair and considerate to all, which he is."

Am I disappointed with his leadership so far? Yes, maybe I was expecting too much but then again I don’t know what his constraints are. Still he himself said that failure is not an option, which suggests that he will fight.

Q: While other politicians have tread on these issues rather delicately, you are seen to have come out with guns blazing.

A: Was I not as discreet as others in my criticisms of the PM? I am a discreet person, but in matters of public interest you have to be open and forthright. It’s also because I want the prime minister to succeed. If not for him I would not be an MP today as I was not the first choice candidate for Kota Baru. But that will not deter me from telling him what I think is good for the country and his administration.

If you believe in the PM’s vision of integrity, of fairness and prosperity for all then you must help to realise his reforms, even if it means having to criticise him.

--Posted by Raja Petra Kamarudin to News & Commentaries at 9/24/2006 10:59:00

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Alleged funding for UM campus election:DAP wants police to investigate MB Selangor




民主行动党向警方举报雪州大臣涉滥用公款收买学生

■日期/Sep 23, 2006 ■时间/03:16:15 pm
■新闻/家国风云 ■作者/MERDEKAREVIEW.COM

实习记者周小芳

(PIX: Lau Weng San, Chairman of PJ DAP Action Team;Batumalai ,Selangor DAP Committee member;Francis Chang, Sg Way Subang DAP branch chairman; and Ronnie Liu, Advisor to PJ DAP Action Team)


【本刊实习记者周小芳撰述】雪州行动党宣传秘书刘永山要求警方介入调查雪州州务大臣莫哈末吉尔(Mohd Khir Toyo)涉嫌动用公款赞助“亲校方”阵线学生入住高级酒店事件。

刘永山说:“作为马来西亚公民,任何人都有责任向警方报案,不然,整件事情就会不了了之。” 他在八打灵再也警察总部报案时如此表示。


今天与民主行动党非政府组织秘书刘天球到八打灵再也警察局向警方报案。

据《当今大马》在9月21日的报道,42名马来亚大学“亲校方”阵线候选人在上周入住八打灵再也的四星级皇冠酒店(Crystal Crown)一晚,并在酒店的餐厅用餐,以作为参选的奖赏。但是,这笔超过5千元的帐单却由雪兰莪州务大臣莫哈末吉尔的办公室支付,换言之,就是使用纳税人的金钱支付。


《当今大马》证实,这些学生预订了32间套房,包括一些位于酒店顶楼的“行政顶楼套房”。不过,无法确定这些学生在居住期间是否有进行其他的活动或节目。

刘永山说,他曾在2006年9月20日发表紧急文告,要求州务大臣莫哈末基尔交待此事,即他本人是否曾经滥用公款,以支付马来亚大学“亲校方”阵线候选人的酒店住宿和膳食,干涉校园选举。可是,州务大臣迄今依然没有针对刘永山的质问做出任何的回应,所以刘永山才选择向警方报案,要求警方彻查此事。

“既然州务大臣胆敢自我宣布雪州为先进州,那么他理应展示一个先进州领导人的风范,正视这个指责,立即交待此事。我也是基于透明与良好施政的基本原则要求州务大臣这么做。”

针对博特拉大学流传影片,显示民主行动党和博大前进阵线有关联之说,刘永山认为这是校方尝试抹黑在野党的作为,是错误的概念。他对校园选举的情况严重到这种地步表示担忧和悲哀。他表示,当议员们在国会里辩论时,又如何和遥远的校园选举有关联呢?他指出,民主行动党只是观察校园选举,并没有干涉在其中。

刘天球也说,他们并没有干涉和影响学生,只是在学生受到打压时才会声援,他认为,声援学生是很自然和公平的事, 也是理所当然的。

刘天球认为,动用公款这种滥权的行为会对校园选举的民主产生很大的破坏。

刘永山说,虽然这笔马币五千元的款项并非是一笔巨额款项,但是始终是纳税人的金钱。而且,雪州州务大臣莫哈末基尔之前也曾经涉及多宗滥用公款和权利的丑闻。

民主行动党国会领袖也曾就校园选举向高教部部长慕斯达化提问,可是高教部长并没有直接给与答复,只是表示,今年的校园选举更加开明、开放和公平。

此外,马大校方在上周二至周三于吉隆坡珍珠国际酒店(Pearl International Hotel)举办一场名为“创业工作营”的活动,出席者都是即将参与校园竞选的“亲校方”阵线准候选人。这些准候选人在该酒店住宿一晚。


消息透露,马大副校长阿查里和其他校方官员,以及一名巫青团全国领袖,都是该工作营的讲师,培训内容包括演讲技巧、团队合作、情绪管理等等,也涉及一些关于校园竞选宣言的讨论。
消息指该工作营只是“挂羊头卖狗肉”,实际上是一场不折不扣选举备战工作营。

DAP PJ Action Team brought urban pioneers problems to MBPJ



木屋區第二第三家庭不獲安頓

火箭行動隊吁市長關注
SINCHEW-updated:2006-09-23 11:13:49 MYT


■劉天球(左二)、劉永山(右二)及居民與市長會面,希望市長能關注木屋分配問題。(放大)


(八打靈再也訊)八打靈再也火箭行動隊委員及木屋區居民會見八打靈再也市長莫哈末羅斯蘭,希望他關注木屋區住戶的第二、第三家庭不獲安頓的問題

八打靈再也火箭行動隊顧問劉天球表示,由於一些當地的國州議員或地方政府協調不好,導致有些木屋居民沒有獲得分配屋子,或原本分配的屋子給外人拿去。


他舉例說,千百家村木屋區的第二、第三家庭,在木屋拆除後,並沒獲得屋子分配,目前住在哥打白沙羅。

他指出,當初雪州行動黨支持零度木屋計劃,是有條件的,即安頓居民,提供廉價屋及搬遷費予木屋居民。

為此,他希望市長別忽略木屋第二、第三家庭的困境,否則該黨將收回對零度木屋計劃的支持。

他要求市長在1個月內解決上述問題,而市長也表示答應。該行動隊也將繼續跟進有關課題。

與市長會面的居民來自雙溪威、海盜村及達南村。

建議拆會堂建遊樂園

劉天球在這次與市長的會面提到,靠近雙溪威1路的甘榜敦姑停工已久的民眾會堂,原本是兒童遊樂園,有關民眾會堂大約建好80%,不過在2年前已停工。他表示,希望市長能實地視察,並建議拆除該民眾會堂,恢復原有的兒童遊樂場。

要求恢復空地原貌

八打靈再也火箭行動隊主席劉永山指出,靠近百樂花園輕快鐵站第20/24路的一塊空地,有項建辦事處的工程,不過,有關工程已廢置。他週五向市長要求收回承建該工程的批准信,並恢復空地的原本面貌。他說,該地區是單層排屋,但有人在該處建約2層樓高的辦事處,這將影響居民的生活素質;過後市長也答應會去調查。

八打靈再也火箭行動隊財政吳炳順也提到,在八打靈再也市政廳內看到靈市大藍圖有更改,而讓公眾發表意見x的期限是在本月29日。他說,藍圖的前後差異很大,若靈市居民對藍圖計劃有任何意見,希望他們可以儘快提出。

(星洲日報/大都會‧2005/09/22)

Are Chinese being marginalized in Malaysia?


Last Friday, Singapore Mentor Minister Lee Kuan Yew has commented that Chinese in Malaysia (and also Indonesia) were being marginalized systematically.

Lee must have said this to serve his party's agenda, i.e. to influence Singaporean Chinese to support PAP so that his party could continue to rule Singapore. But I'm afraid what he has said was not very far from the truth in Malaysia.

Gerakan's outgoing chief Lim Keng Yaik and his heir apparent Koh Tsu Koon have no credibility to tell Kuan Yew off as their party, Gerakan, is being marginalised by their own partners in the Barisan Nasional coalition, i.e.UMNO and MCA.

Keng Yaik should know more than anybody else that how Chinese and other non-Malays were being marginalized in this country.

As a long-serving minister, I believe he knows exactly how the non-Malays were being discriminated and marginalized under the New Economic Policy(NEP). And looks like the non-Malays will be haunted by the NEP for many more years to come if people like Khairy Jamaluddin and Hishamuddin Hussein continue to have their say.

Keng Yaik should know how the Chinese schools were being marginalized in this country.If UMNO continues to push for the 2-4-3 formula and finally decided to hold examinations only in English for Maths and Science come 2008, that will be the end-of-the-road for Chinese schools in Malaysia.

He should also know that the cultures of the non-Malays were not even considered as part of the national culture. He should still remember how Lion Dance was almost forced to change to Tiger Dance, and how Chinese signboards were almost forced to be taken down without any justification.

Keng Yaik should not forget that until today, non of the non-Malays have made it to the top in the police force, armed forces and public universities. Do you mean we could not find a single non-Malay who was qualified for the top job?

He should still remember that we used to have a Chinese Governor in Melaka, and non-Malays were used to be given the opportunity to lead some important ministries, such as the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Trade and Industry. Not anymore. We do not even have a single Chinese DO (District Officer) in the entire country.

Keng Yaik could not agree with Kuan Yew probably because he felt ashamed for not being able to saveguard the interest of the non-Malays in this country as a minister. He probably realised that by admitting that the Chinese in Malaysia were being marginalized would not be a good reflection on him.

I may even argue that even the Malays were being marginalized in this country under the rule of Barisan Nasional Government. Only UMNO-putras, MCA taikos and MIC warlords stand to benefit with their special political connections. They run the country as if they own the whole country, and the rest of poor Malaysians were being marginalized by them for the past half a century.

I like to quote the statement made by DongJiaoZong yesterday to illustrate how Chinese schools/ Chinese were being marginalized...

"188 years to build 134 schools

From 1970 to 2006, it is estimated that the country saw an increase of 2,900 national schools.

During the same period, a total of 193 vernacular schools - 58 Chinese schools and 134 Tamil schools - closed down.


According to DJZ, there is a demand for 134 Chinese schools nationwide at present.

“If the government only builds five or so Chinese schools every four years once when an election comes, then it will take 188 years, or 47 elections, before the 134 schools will be completed.

“But by then, the population will increase and more schools would be needed,” said the movement. "

Friday, September 22, 2006

My first impression of the new Mayor of MBPJ

I have met the new Mayor of MBPJ for the first time this morning together with Lau Weng San ( PJ Action Team chairman) and Thomas Goh (Treasurer) at his office. He has kept the tradition of seeing resdients of Petaling Jaya on every Friday.

He appears friendly and warm with the DAP PJ delegation and nice to all the villagers who came along with us.

He listens to our complaints and suggestions carefully and in fact promises to resolve the mess created by the local MCA elected reps within a month.

In the meeting, we have brought to his attention about the mishandling of squatters problems on the part of MCA elected reps and the flaws and weaknesses of the Zero Squatter Policy in general, and a number of specific issues, namely:

1. Insufficient low-cost units for villagers from Kg Damansara Dalam, Kg Cempaka and Kg Micheal Chen (of Sg Way).
2. Status of housing alternatives for second,third and fourth families, especially for Kg Cempaka (about 40 families) and Kg Micheal Chen, Sg way.
2.Investigation into units taken by outsiders (Kg Damansara Dalam, where several police reports were made by some villagers two months ago)
3. Abandoned Balairaya project in Kg Tunku ( initaited by Dr Wong Sai Hau, SA of Kg Tunku).
4.Abandoned Service Centre building related to Dr Wong Sai Hau ( right in front of Paramount LRT station).

PRO Zainun Zakaria was also in the meeting.

此时此刻,我们更加怀念张景良先生。

此时此刻,我们更加怀念张景良先生。

真要“感谢” 副教育部长诺奥马坦白公告,在第九大马计划下兴建的180间学校,无一间是华小或淡小!

诺奥马虽然面目难看,但是相对于之前一直含糊其辞的韩春景和马华民政人联党头头,不是更加可憎复可恶吗?

在此风雨飘摇的时刻,令人更加怀念张景良先生。如果张老仍然在世在位,必然身先士卒,将诺奥马之流痛骂一顿。

我有幸认识张老,由于他领导的雪兰莪中华大会堂推动“精英文化义演” 全国巡回演出,得到我服务的广告社客户健力士公司的大力赞助,使我有机会参与其盛,略尽棉力。

纪念张老的最好方法,莫如继承他的遗志,在华教和文化事业上“有一分热,发一分光” !

民主行动党总部已经联络主办单位准备花圈,以示追思和表扬张先生对民主和民族事业的贡献。

让我们一起来出席本星期天在雪隆华堂举办的张景良追思会。

相关新闻如下:

四团体联办追思会
表扬张景良贡献

隆雪华堂Sep 20, 06 2:57pm

吉隆坡暨雪兰莪中华大会堂、马来西亚留台校友会联合总会、国立台湾大学马来西亚同学会,以及华社研究中心定于9月24日(星期日),上午11时正,假隆雪华堂举行《张景良追思会》,以表扬及追思已故张景良先生对我国华人社会的贡献。

张景良(1933-2006)出生于1933年,祖籍广东新会。他在吉兰丹接受华小教育,在槟城钟灵中学毕业,1962年毕业于国立台湾大学电机工程系,先后获得马来西亚、新加坡、英国以及美国 工程师协会会员的专业资格。

从1970年代初期开始,张景良便积极参与社团,活跃于各项社会工作。他先后担任台大校友会会长、留台联总会长、雪兰莪中华大会堂会长、全国十五华团领导机构联委会主席、全国华团民权委员会主席、关注政府修改1961年教育法令行动委员会主席、华社研究中心管理委员会主席等等。

他曾荣获1990年留台联总最高荣誉贡献奖、2003年被中华民国侨务委员会推选为世界十大杰出校友之一。

张景良的重要贡献,在留台联总方面,主要包括推动留台联总的成立及购置会所、发起组织留台工程组,争取留台工程师、化学师的权益、争取政府承认留台学位、创办“文化之夜”等等。

在隆雪华堂方面,张景良参与了1983年的全国华人文化大会、参与推动首创全国华人文化节;1985《全国华团联合宣言》发表后,张景良便通过全国十五华团领导机构推动成立全国华团民权委员会,大力推动民主人权的思想教育工作。

1987年在吉隆坡天后宫举行的华团与朝野政党捍卫华教大会,张景良担任大会主席;他也积极争取政府释放在“茅草行动”中被扣留的社团人士。

此外,他也促成了“精英文化义演”的全国巡回演出。

张景良坐言起行,树立了知识分子剑及履及,以行动来奉献社会,以无畏无私的道德勇气争取民主人权的典范。

张景良于今年9月8日与世长辞。他的辞世,不但是家属痛失亲人,也是华社的重大损失。

为了表扬张景良对华社的贡献,同时树立良好的社会典范,于是隆雪华堂等四个团体联办《张景良追思会》。

《张景良追思会》的程序如下
1. 追思会正式开始,介绍联办单位代表及嘉宾
2. 全体默哀三分钟
3. 张景良生平事迹电脑投影片介绍
4. 宣读追悼文
5. 联办团体及友好团体献花
6. 联办单位代表致词
7. 友好致词
8. 张景良遗孀献花
9. 家属代表致词
10. 公众献花
11. 追悼会结束/自助午餐

联办单位呼吁社会各界,包括各社团代表,以及张景良先生生前的战友和友好,踊跃出席这项深具意义的追思会以及小型展览。

联办单位也代为安排定购花圈的服务,每个花圈100令吉。除了联办单位之外,已经确定敬献花圈的主要团体包括董总、教总、校友联总、南大校友会、中国驻马大使馆、留台工程师协会、驻马台北经济文化办事处、钟灵校友会、双溪大年新民校友会等。

任何询问,可联络隆雪华堂秘书处蔡美莲小姐(电话:03-22746645),或留台联总李宗顺先生(电话:03-7876 4542)。

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Denial the best answer of MCA leaders like Chew


In a Malaysiakini report today, PJ Utara MP Chew Mei Fun has denied that she and her colleagues have actually said that they have "90%" gotten the 'nga lan' (land titles) for the people living in Kg Micheal Chen, Sg Way in the thick of 2004 general election campaigns.

Chew's response was expected as denial is always the best weapon MCA leaders like Chew could use when they were finally proven wrong or exposed. They will never admit their mistakes even if you throw their own letter and the newspaper cuttings (filled with what they have said or promised) to them.

And they would never answer your questions directly because avoiding difficult questions is the best option to them.

But what can the Sg Way people do now that their homes were destroyed?

Some of them turned out in force to join the Barisan Nasional/ MCA procession on the nomination day of last election with a big banner with supportive messages for Chew. Would they turn around to teach Chew a lesson in the coming elections now that they felt cheated by her?

Lim Bee Choon said he would certainly do that. He hopes other victimised residents could do the same. Lim's family spent a lot of money to renovate their two-storeyed house here when they were convinced that the MCA reps were genuine and sincere in obtaining the necessary land title for them.

Another victim Tee Chai Huat blames Chew for misleading the residents. " If she cannot get the titles for us, the least she could do was to get straight and focused on getting the rightful compensation for us." he added.

Here's the report from Andrew Ong of Malaysiakini...


Villagers accuse MCA reps of breaking promise

Andrew OngSep 20, 06 6:57pm

MCA leaders broke their promise! This is what several evicted residents of Kampung Michael Cheng in Petaling Jaya claim.

According to them, two MCA elected representatives had promised them land grants but this never materialised.

Demolition works carried out by the Petaling Jaya City Council (MPBJ) since Aug 31 has reduced the 141 brick-and-mortar single-story terrace houses to rubble.

However, Petaling Jaya Utara MP Chew Mei Fun denied that she had promised them the grants prior to the 2004 general election.

The MCA leader claimed that opposition party DAP was exploiting the issue and taking advantage of the residents. “What I promised is that I will try my best to obtain the grants for them. I have tried and delivered whatever I can,” she said when contacted.

The residents’ ordeal started in the 1970's when they were urged to move to the village located in Seri Setia during the communist insurgency. Most of them agreed when told they would receive grants to the land. Since 2002, there have been repeated threats to demolish their houses as the villagers were deemed as squatters, despite a majority of them being legitimate ratepayers.

Appeal letter

This morning, former residents Lim Bee Choon and Tee Chai Huat showed reporters their recent utility bills, assessment receipts and news clippings during a press conference organised by the DAP PJ Action Team (PAT).

Their point of contention was a letter carrying the signatures of Chew and Kg Tunku assemblyperson Wong Sai Hou distributed during the politicians’ door-to-door election campaign in the area.

The appeal letter urged Selangor Menteri Besar Dr Mohd Khir Toyo to expedite the grants. The letter also bore Khir’s signature with a short note from the menteri besar calling on the district officer to ‘consider’ the appeal. Mohd Khir’s note was dated March 14, 2004 - one week before the general election.

During election time, Lim and Tee said villagers were assured that their grants were ‘almost ready’ and that the letter was the proof. “We were told (by several MCA representatives) that we cannot seek help from the opposition and maintain a ‘low-profile’ in handling the matter,” said Lim.

False hope

Meanwhile, PAT advisor Ronnie Liu lambasted MCA elected representatives for making empty promises and giving the residents false hope. He said the representatives should admit their mistake and apologise.

In defence, Chew said MCA had tried its best to obtain the grants but they could not supercede the state government’s decision to develop the land. “As far as we are concerned, the villagers are well taken care of,” she added.

There was also an allegation that some evicted residents were allowed to only buy one low-cost flat unit when their house in Kampung Michael Chen housed more than one family. Commenting on this, Chew said: “My door is always open. If there are still problems they can come see me.”

The residents are currently housed in transit homes in Kota Damansara and Lembah Subang. They have been offered low-cost flat units which will be built on the site of their former houses.

To the MCA, the meaning of 'Nga Lan' is ' rotten teeth'



"Chew Mei Fun, where is my 'Nga Lan' ? "
This senior folk (pix on the top ) turned to his demolished home on Sg way Road 4, also known as Kg Micheal Chen or Huo Jie Xian (High Tension Wire Zone) , after asking this question which YB Chew has been avoiding these days.

He brought the reporters and DAP PJ Action Team members to his broken home for one ' last look'. The poor man has been living here for almost half a decade. He regreted for trusting the MCA. He said the residents here should not have turned the DAP away when the party has came to offer help. It's all too late now.

Loh Chee Ming (pix at the bottom) ,42, also lost his home on this Merdeka Day without any compensation. He too has trusted Chew to help. But now, he was being kicked around by MCA and MPPJ (now MBPJ) officers like a "human ball". He has not received the letter of offer for a low-cost unit with the rightful compensation just because his house was wrongly marked ( with a same number as his neigbour) by MPPJ officers. That was not his fault. (Note: We will bring him along when we weet the new Mayor of MBPJ this Friday. See if the new Mayor can clear the mess created by the MCA reps in PJ.)

PJ Utara MP Chew Mei Fun has promised them that they will be given land titles immediately after the 2004 general elections on the condition that they must return her as an MP for another term. But Chew was already fully aware at that point of time that the entire Kg Micheal Chen was given to Taipan Focus for redevelpment under the Zero Squatters Policy 2005. I have with me a document, which Chew has put down her signature, as an evidence.

In fact, Chew and Dr Wong have appeared together with the developer as early as 2002, in a meet the residents session held at a local Chinese temple, on the issue of redevelopment. They may (or may not) know that I was there throughout the meeting that night!

I have informed all the 141 house-owners here about the 'ugly truth' but most of the residents here have chosen to believe Chew. Majority of them have voted for Chew, thinking that she would not lied to them.

Others who have made similar promise include Dr Wong Sai Hou ( state assemblyman of Kg Tunku) . Both Chew and dr Wong issued a joint letter on 17 March 2004, just a few days before the polling, plus a supporting letter choped and signed with a remark by the Selangor MB Dr Khir Toyo. This letter, plus the verbal promise and open statement in the press made by the two ( and also the weekly meeting with the residents) have convinced many residents here to vote for them.

The other person who has given false hope and empty promise to them was none other than the MCA President Ong Ka Ting. At a mass dinner held in 2002 here, he openly told the residents that their homes would not be demolished and individual land titles were in the process. He too told the residents not to believe in DAP leaders, and MCA will be able to help. Needless to say, his words did carry some weight at that time. But not anymore. Because the residents in Sg way finally realised that 'Nga Lan' to the MCA could only mean 'bad teeth'.

Chew and Wong have now gone hiding now that the houses were demolished, finally. I was told that many of the second or third families have yet to be alloted with a low-cost unit.

So, where is the 'Nga Lan', YB Chew ?

( The MCA State Assemblyman for Damansara Utama C.K.Lim also screwed up 'big time' in his constituency. More than 40 second and third families from Kg Cempaka(demolished last year) have yet to be alloted with low-cost units. They were stucked at the Kota Damansara temporary flats. And more than five families living in Kg Damansara Dalam were denied their rightful homes and they have reasons to believe that their units were taken but C.K Lim's right hand man illegally. They have made police reports with the PJ Police some months back. And the police have yet to act, as usual)

Note: 'Nga Lan' , land title, could also mean ' bad teeth'.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

行动党支持警员加薪



行动党支持警员加薪,认同加薪有助减低贪污受贿行为

民主行动党中委兼非政府组织局主任刘天球文告
2006年9月19日星期二
八打灵再也

民主行动党认为普通警员薪金低微,与他们所承担的工作和职责不符,更追不上通货膨胀,因此曾经多次在国会要求政府调整警员薪金。

我党也认为调整警员薪金至合理水平有助于维护警员的尊严,进而提升士气,提高效率,为人民提供更良好的服务。

目前普通警员的最低薪金低微,每月只有马币六百五十元。警员贪污受贿现象日益严重,与他们的待遇有一定的关系,虽然提升薪金不能确保所有警员都不再涉及贪污受贿的行为,毕竟警队与其它政府部门一样,其中不乏害群之马。

新上任的总警长慕沙哈山提出提升警员薪金的要求,理应获得政府的正视。我党希望政府从善如流,严正检讨警员薪金(尤其是普通警员的薪金) ,制定一套实际的警务人员薪金制,从而提高警队士气和警员的形像。

当然,民众也希望政府早日落实皇家调查委员会的建议,包括全面改革警队,成立IPCMC来监督警队的操守。

由于国家行政管理不当,经济发展遇阻,市道欠佳,再加上警队办事不力,目前犯罪率急升,已经达到人人自危的地步。民众对于警务人员早有烦言。

总警长日前誓言全面打击罪犯,民众有所期盼,我们拭目以待。

但是总警长较早前开反对成立IPCMC,已经令民众感觉警队不思改革,已经进一步导致警队公信力和威信荡然无存。

如果总警长只是提出要求加薪,对于IPCMC的成立却带领全体警务人员大力抗拒,则难以取信于人民,甚至最终挫败加薪的诉求。

民主行动党促请阿都拉政府双管齐下,早日成立IPCMC以配合改革警队,同时制定合理的警务人员薪金制,以便全面提升警队士气和提高打击罪犯的效率。

/ 刘天球

从台湾倒扁总统大集会到翁诗杰评干捞小风波。。。


台湾倒扁静坐运动其实是一项规模盛大的人民反贪运动。最终阿扁政府是否因而倒台有待揭晓,但其包含的重大社会/历史意义和影响力,则无庸置疑。

反观阿都拉政府肃贪行动有气无力,“得个讲字“(广东话),结果贪污指数只升不降,比起老马时代实“有过之而无不及”,人民即使不愿走上街头静坐,至少也应该齐齐“呛声”才对。可是马来西亚人民却似乎无动于衷,令人叹三声!

马华的 “独行侠” 这次纯粹针对学校拨款被“干捞” 事件评论两句,就被国阵“自己人”修理得体无完肤,同党同僚同志又不愿也不敢为他讲一两句公道话;结果被内阁责骂不算,顶头上司竟然还代为道歉,确是人间奇事一桩,再次印证“MALAYSIA BOLEH”。(顺便一提,此口号本是小弟的旧公司为客户美禄创作者,没想到后来被政府领袖敢敢盗用,没付一分钱版权费)。

本来对翁“大侠”感到不平,不过后来想想,独行侠虽然被同僚责骂,但是在民间得到美名。只要懂得自我克制,暂时封口,官位还是保得住的;而骂人者如希山,不是也得到内阁和一些极端分子所吹捧吗。所谓“一家便宜两家着”,戏正上映,华校待遇一如既往,吃亏的最终还是老百姓。

今早在<当今大马>读到杨白杨先生的大作,一贯的嘻笑怒骂,反讽侧击,特此转载。。。


请勿在此高喊反贪

杨白杨Sep 18, 06 3:29pm

杨白杨,原名杨文波,另有笔名欧阳恩、李安、马明、胡先及陈默等,马来亚大学中文系及教育系毕业,擅长散文、杂文及时评。他在我国报章撰写过多个专栏,其文字多变,或正经严肃、讲情说理,或嬉笑怒骂、反讽侧击,或直抒胸怀、真情流露,极受读者欢迎。已结集出版者有《坦然集》、《华团漫步》、《神伤中国》、《黑白之间》、《无关政治》及《百字书》。杨白杨简介及他所写过的专栏杨白杨电邮: yangbaiyang@gmail.com

眼前的台湾,进行着轰轰烈烈的反贪污反腐败运动,成千上万的普通老百姓走上街头,高喊反贪倒扁的口号。我们马来西亚的观众,天天追看剧情的发展,一面看,一面叹息,口中念念有词:这种事情,绝对不会在马来西亚发生!

我不知道这些观众的叹息和念念有词是什么意思。他们也许是说这种一百万人走上街头反贪腐而没有被镇压的事情绝对不会在马来西亚发生,因为他们看过几百个人走上街头反对汽油涨价而被镇压的镜头。几百个人走上街头反对汽油涨价都会被镇压,一百万人走上街头反贪腐而不被镇压,对他们来说,简直不可思议。

说“这种事情绝对不会在马来西亚发生”的人,也有可能认为像台湾的贪腐现象绝对不会在马来西亚发生,因为我国首相不是台湾总统陈水扁,他的女婿不像陈水扁的女婿,他的家庭成员不像陈水扁的家庭成员,他们没有被检察署调查。而且,执政的巫统前主席马哈迪不像民进党前主席施明德,可以发动百万人游行高喊阿扁下台。

因此,发生在台湾的事情绝对不会在马来西亚发生。

我国政府清明廉洁,部长们都是玉洁冰清的政党领袖,他们反贪反腐惟恐不及,怎么会干贪污舞弊的事情呢?部长们以身作则,属下官员当然一个个分文不贪,要是有人乱喊反贪污,对他们就是一种很大的伤害。所以,在我国马来西亚,高喊反贪污反腐败,是一种禁忌。不要说高喊反贪污,即使听到有人揭发贪污事件,也不要随便评述,因为这样也可能惹祸上身。大家要明哲保身,就像听到邻居高喊有有人打抢的时候,不要一马当先冲出来,这样可能会被强盗砍死。

副高教部长翁诗杰最近不小心评述华小拨款被干捞事件,结果惹来一身蚂蚁,还祸延他的上司高教部长要站出来代表他道歉,就像小孩子做错事情,父母出来道歉一样。

一切都是翁诗杰的错,他没有看清我国是个清廉的国家。有人揭露华小拨款被骑劫,他听到了应该当场加以驳斥,洗刷同僚的清白,那里可以附和着来评述,讥讽贪污者干捞政府的拨款。这样有辱有关部门官员的清白。翁诗杰是高教部的,他只能针对高教部的贪污现象加以评述,对其他部门,他就不应该多管闲事。

看到台湾反贪倒扁大游行,不禁想要奉劝翁诗杰,要喊反贪污反腐败,到外国去喊吧。比方,可以到中国去喊。这有例可循。翁诗杰如果是福建人,可以到中国的福建省去喊反贪污,我国的报纸今年四月间已经大事报导过,福建籍的马来西亚大官到中国福建省去喊反贪污反腐败,结果“博得全场如雷的掌声”。翁诗杰是海南人,可以到海南岛去喊反贪污反腐败,他如果引述中国前总理朱容基的名言,说已经备好一百副棺材,誓和贪官污吏同归于尽,相信也一定能够博得全场如雷的掌声。

所以,不要把台湾和马来西亚来比,台湾是中国的一部份,在中国,反贪污反腐败会博得如雷的掌声,在马来西亚,要喊反贪污反腐败的人,要自己多多保重了,绝对不会有百万人民走上街头和你一起喊的。这种事情,绝对不会在马来西亚发生。

Monday, September 18, 2006

皇冠镇VS GRAND SAGA 大道收费站公司

要求无条件开放主要通道 300居民徒步请愿 2006/09/17 18:11:13●南洋商报

(吉隆坡17日讯)皇冠城居民在忍无可忍情况下,由皇冠城开路委员会带领,首次徒步游行高举大字报至500公尺的收费站和平请愿,要求无条件开放主要通道。

逾300名居民扶老携幼带着愤怒的情绪,从皇冠城主要通道边走边高喊“BUKA JALAN”(开路),横跨整个11英里收费站到大道收费公司,游行队伍约300公尺长,霎时引起车龙,所有的车辆也鸣笛以示支持。

车辆鸣笛支持

加影警区首席警长法兹在收费站质问委员会主席陈文华时,居民情绪一度高涨涌上前,表示不满。尽管整个和平请愿在烈日当空下,警方、居民与大道公司职员之间不断燃烧冲突的情绪,警方也如往常派出12名联邦后备队维持持续,但始终没有发生不愉快事件。

大道公司执行董事再纳阿比丁首次会见蕉赖区国会议员及居民代表,并公开部分信件,陈国伟在会见后指出,大道公司所出示的信件说明,如果任何引起大道公司金钱上的损失,当局有权力进行封路行动。“但是,这只是大道公司单方面所提供的信件,公说公有理,婆说婆有理,我们必须看完发展商及政府的信件才能作为标准。”

后备队员解散人群 2006/09/17 18:11:13●南洋商报

(吉隆坡17日讯)早上10时25分时,法兹首次与陈文华交涉,要求在10分钟内解散人群,但居民在长期被欺压下,游行至大道公司。当人群抵达加影前往蕉赖收费站方向时,警方出动12名联邦后备队成员,谕令在10分钟后解散人群。

刘天球与法兹交涉时,法兹说明该区属于公共地方,不允许任何聚会,否则采取行动。但刘天球坚持居民只是要会见大道公司代表,只要大道公司肯出来交代,居民一定离去。

随后,居民在刘天球及陈文华带领下,走入大道公司办公楼,然而警方却尾随于后,在大道公司门口与刘天球发生口角。

皇冠镇VS GRAND SAGA 大道收费站公司





步行到大道公司大廈請願 300人抗議甘榜路封鎖
星洲日报 SINCHEW updated:2006-09-18 12:42:41 MYT

■居民聚集在鐵柵前要求見地主,可是不成功,當時該處已經有加影警方人員駐守。(放大)
■加影警方召來十多名聯邦后備隊駐守,並揚言如果居民不解散,就會採取逮捕行動。(放大)
■劉天球(左二)和弗茲(右)交涉,要求警方讓居民等到會見大道公司代表之後才解散。雙方一度僵持,氣氛緊張!(放大)
■劉天球(左起)、陳國偉、陳文華向再納汀解釋居民和平情願的心聲。(放大)

■約300位皇冠城居民情緒高漲,步行到約400公尺外的大道公司,要求會見負責人,聲勢浩大。(放大)

(加影訊)蕉賴皇冠城主要通道旁邊甘榜路安裝鐵柵風波升級,約300名居民情緒高漲的居民,週日早步行到距離該通道400公尺外的大道公司大廈和平請願,過程中多次和警方交涉,警方甚至揚言要採取逮捕行動,使氣氛一度緊張!

不過,最後在行動黨蕉賴國會議員陳國偉、皇冠城開路委員會顧問劉天球和主席陳文華代表會見蕉加大道(GRAND SAGA)大道公司執行董事再納阿比汀,雙方取得一些協議后才使風波結束。

連續第11個週日請願

這一個小時會談的結果是,居民委任陳國偉為中間人,負責安排居民、大道公司、皇冠城發展商和政府部門進行對話會,儘速解決皇冠城主要通道問題。

週日早也是皇冠城居民連續第11個星期日,在被封鎖的主要通道路口舉行和平請願,不過卻是首次步行到位於蕉賴11英里收費站旁的大道公司大廈,要求會見大道公司高層。

聯邦後備隊卡車維持秩序

由於居民情緒高漲,不時高喊要求開放道路,原本只是駐守觀察的加影警方,最后召來十多名聯邦後備隊及大卡車維持秩序。直到中午12時45分,在上述3名代表會見大道公司代表進行會談後,居民才解散。

委任陳國偉為中間人

劉天球說,與再納阿比汀會談時,對方出示一些文件,證明大道公司在合約上的一些權力,不過那只是大道公司單方面的說詞。“我們還需要再向蕉賴皇冠城發展商和政府相關部門求證,才能確定大道公司的權限,所以陳文華也提出了建議,要求委任陳國偉為中間人,安排各造針對此事會談,尋求解決方案。”

陳國偉說,大道公司、發展商和人民在這事件上各有所持立場,這些立場基本上都沒有錯,最大錯誤是政府,政府至今在這課題上,沒有給以明確訊息。

陳國偉說,他受委為中間人,會安排各造進行會談,儘速尋求方案,解決此事。

蕉賴皇冠城居民和平請願流程表

10.00am:約60名居民聚集在鐵柵處抗議,要求見地主解釋為何封路,不果。當時該處已經有數名警員駐守,也有保安人員看守該鐵柵。
10.30am:居民越來越多,情緒開始高漲,一些人手持寫上封路或不滿字眼的卡紙,一起步行大道收費站及大道公司大廈外和平請願。警方旁觀,許多途經駕駛者則按車笛,以行支持。10.40am:加影首席警長弗茲開始干預,要求人民解散,勿聚集在收費站前,並揚言要採取逮捕行動,隨後十多名聯邦後備隊出現。在劉天球出面交涉後,弗茲答應讓居民請願至11時。11.00am:居民進入大道公司大廈內,聚集在辦公室入口處。
11.15am:弗茲再次要求居民解散,並揚言居民不解釋,他會採取強硬手段,這番話引起居民不滿,雙方僵持不下。
11.20am:陳國偉到來,居民鼓掌歡迎。他向居民發表談話,指警方應保護人民,不應以恐嚇方式,阻止居民為自己爭取使用道路的權利,他表示行動黨之前還在國會內為警方爭取加薪。11.25am:弗茲阻止陳國偉繼續發言,雙方僵持一陣后,居民仿傚台灣倒扁,不過是以“靜站” 方式,要求會見大道公司高層。
11.40am:再納阿比汀出現,會見陳國偉、劉天球和陳文華,陳國偉司機梁國民要隨著進入辦公室受阻。
12.00pm:加影警區公共秩序及交通組主任再汀副警監到來。
12.40pm:雙方會談結束,陳國偉受居民委為皇冠城主要通道事件中間人,安排各造會談解決此事。
12.45:居民解散,和平請願結束。


新聞背景

· 主要通道旁邊的甘榜路段於上週五(15日)被人安裝上鐵柵封鎖,禁止民眾使用該路通往蕉加大道。
· 甘榜路封鎖後,許多車輛被迫迴轉,必須使用雙溪龍鎮主要通道,以及經過蕉賴11哩的收費站,往返目的地。
· 甘榜路段長約60公尺,自蕉賴皇冠城主要通道被封鎖後,成為皇冠城和雙溪龍鎮居民避開蕉賴11哩收費站,通往蕉加大道的交替路。
· 之前,市議會曾根據甘榜居民的投訴,兩度以石墩以及挖掘深坑封鎖該路。不過,在蕉賴皇冠城居民的抗議以及行動黨協助下,兩項行動都宣告失敗。
(星洲日報/大都會‧2005/09/17

BMC residents Vs Grand Saga

(pix) Fauzi, the man who threatened to use force against the BMC and Sg Long residents.

Bandar Mahkota Cheras residents had a protest this morning. They marched from the barricades to the Grand Saga office nearby. They managed to force the Grand Saga management to come to talk with them although today is Sunday.

The police has earlier threatened to use brutal force to chase away the residents but was wooed away by the 500- strong crowd.

Grand Saga deputy chairman Zainal Abidin bin Ali (former OCPD of Dang Wangi) finally appeared in his office to hold a meeting with Tan Boon Wah ( Bandar Mahkota Cheras Free Access Action Committee Chairman), Ronnie Liu (Advisor to the action committee) and YB Tan Kok Wai ( DAP Cheras MP) but offer no solution. He just kicked the ball to the developer, Narajaya Sdn Bhd of the Lion Group (controlled Tan Sri William Cheng).

The action committee has appointed Tan Kok Wai to be their coordinator. Tan is trusted to hold an all-party meeting ( incl developer, Grand Saga, Works Ministry, MPKj and the action committee) to find a solution.

Currently, BMC residents were forced to travel an extra 6.5 km everyday. They also have to pay RM1.20 (to and fro) everyday and get caught in traffic jams during peak hours.

Today's action was the 11th gatherings organised by the action commitee with the help of the DAP every Sunday.

I have confronted the police officer in-charge (Chief Inspector Fauzi) who threatened to use force to disperse the residents and even to arrest them. I wanted him to withdraw his threat and told him off openly.I said the duty and responsibilty of the police were to maintain law and order and they should not be taking side with the developer or the toll concessionaire.

Tan Kok Wai also took the opportunity to tell the police to arrest robbers and thieves instead of arresting the residents. He said the DAP has asked for higher pay and allowance for the police force in Parliament. He urged the police to protect the residents instead of causing trouble to them.

He said the Works Minister is expected to reply questions raised by the Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang in the Parliament next week.

Here's a report published by China Press...

皇冠城封路風波300人再請願求開路

(加影17日訊)皇冠城開路行動委員會今早10時,再次召集居民在封路處和平請願,要求私營化公司開路讓居民通行。

逾有300人集合在被封的蕉賴-加影大道路口及甘榜私人地路口,並頻頻詢問把守甘榜私人地段的守衛,以了解到底誰下令築鐵柵門封住甘榜私人地段路口,不給車輛當交替路通行。

較后,眾人拉大隊走約半公里路程,前往附近的私營化公司克蓮沙嘉辦事處求見公司董事。

行動黨雪州領袖劉天球、蕉賴區國會議員陳國偉到場協助。

他們在克蓮沙嘉方面允許下,陪同行動委員會主席陳文華,前往辦公室會見副董事主席再納阿必汀談約1小時才結束。

此外,居民從皇冠城被封的路段,越過蕉賴-加影大道蕉賴11哩收費站到辦事處,也沿路大喊“開路,開路”口號。

逾20名制服或便服警方調往駐守;和平請願者也遵循警方人員指示,站在辦事處的路邊,以免阻礙交通和發生意外。

警長與居民小爭執

儘管如此,到場維持秩序的加影警區首席警長弗西卻數度下令居民離開,與居民發生小爭執。
他表示,若民眾不聽令離去,將促下屬採取強硬行動驅散人群。不過,在劉天球、陳文華及其他人勸說,警方沒有採取行動。

在辦事處大門前集會時,警官也走入干涉,並命令群眾在10分鐘內離去,但陳國偉基于是私人地,認為警方沒有權力這么做。

惟他願意停止向集合在場的居民發表演說,並吩咐眾人靜坐一旁,以等候3各代表進入辦事處會談的最新消息。

整個請願行動由早上10時許開始至下午1時許結束。在這2小時,並沒有不愉快事件發生。

陳國偉答應當協調員聯絡各造商討對策

蕉賴區國會議員陳國偉答應成為封路風波的協調員,並將聯絡發展商、私營化公司和政府部門等各造,開會商討解決方案。

他今日會見克蓮沙嘉副董事主席再納阿比汀后,這么表示。

他說,從再納阿比汀出示的文件中,發現情況與較早前發展商所提供的資料有出入。

他說,文件指出,地方政府于1994年批准皇冠城發展籃圖,包括修建出入口,而1995年才批准大道計劃。

情況不明確未能開放

“無論如何,政府有責任解決此風波。”


此外,開路行動委員會顧問劉天球說,“該私營化公司與發展商的說法南轅北轍,不懂誰才正確,目前,我們也須等待皇冠城發展商怎么說,無論如何,被封鎖的路口暫時還不能開。”


他將協助開路行動委員會找出真相,並協助聯絡各造召開商討會議,解決封路問題。


另外,行動委員會主席陳文華表示,已委任陳國偉為總協調員,協助召集各造會議。
他促請發展商提供一切所需文,讓各方代表來討論。


他表示,下週的行動尚須視情況而定,同時也通過短訊聯絡居民。

(Grand Saga Toll Plaza @ Cheras 10th Mile)

Sunday, September 17, 2006

history of independence - Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad et al

Bukan tokoh Umno saja perjuang kemerdekaan negara

Oleh Azamin Amin KUALA LUMPUR, 15 Sept (HARAKAH) -

Perjuangan menuntut kemerdekaan negara bukan sekadar 'dimonopoli' Umno semata, malah turut disumbang dan mendapat pengorbanan daripada para pejuang yang dianggap 'kiri' oleh penjajah British pada ketika itu.

Keberanian perlu ada untuk merungkai semula fakta sejarah dan memberi pertimbangan adil dalam mendedahkan pengorbanan para pejuang seperti Ustaz Abu Bakar Al-Baqir, Dr Burhanuddin Al-Helmy dan Ahmad Boestamam melalui pertubuhan-pertubuhan pimpinan mereka seperti Hizbul Muslimin, Parti Kebangsaan Melayu Malaya (PKMM), Angkatan Pemuda Insaf (API) Angkatan Wanita Sedar (AWAS), Baris Tani Se-Malaya (BATAS), Majlis Agama Tertinggi Se-Malaya (MATA) untuk memerdekakan negara ini.

Jangan lupa jasa mereka... Dr Dzulkifli, Rustam Sani, Ronnie Liu dan James Wong dalam forum "Pensejarahan Semula Perjuangan Kemerdekaan" mahu sejarah dikaji semua dalam mengangkat dan menyanjung pejuang yang dilabel radikal dan 'kiri' yang dinafikan sejarah pengorbanan mereka yang turut menuntut kemerdekaan sebagai wira negara.

Inilah antara lontaran hujah dan perbincangan di antara ahli panel yang terdiri daripada Pengarah Pusat Penyelidikan PAS (PPP), Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad; bekas Timbalan Presiden Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM),Rustam Sani; AJK DAP, Ronnie Liu dan Ketua Strategik Analisis Malaysia(SAM), James Wong dalam forum 'Pensejarahan Semula Perjuagan Merdeka' semalam.

Forum yang dianjurkan 'Youth for Change' (Y4C) di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina Selangor itu dimoderatorkan oleh Lee Khai Loon dihadiri oleh seramai 50 orang peserta yang terdiri daripada pelbagai lapisan masyarakat.

"Perjuangan sebenar menuntut kemerdekaan sedari awal bukanlah dipelopori oleh Umno/Perikatan tetapi pemimpin-pemimpin dan pertubuhan-pertubuhan di labelkan radikal dan berhaluan kiri oleh British," kata Dr Dzulkifli.

"Perlu ada keberanian untuk mendedahkan perkara ini. Justeru, selagi mana fakta sejarah sebenar dirahsiakan dengan menonjolkan pejuang-pejuang kemerdekaan secara selektif; dengan menyatakan perjuangan menuntut kemerdekaan hanyalah dipelopori oleh pertubuhan moderat Melayu iaitu Umno, lantas menafikan peranan para pemimpin dan pertubuhan lain, maka selagi itulah semangat meraikan kemerdekaan secara bersama tidak akan tercapai," katanya lagi.

Kata beliau Umno dan Perikatan hanya menyambung usaha menuntut kemerdekaan daripada British setelah pemimpin-pemimpin yang dilabelkan radikal ini ditahan oleh British.

Rustam Sani pula mahu penafsiran dan definisi kemerdekaan dikaji semula dengan fikiran yang telus dan tajam supaya jati diri dan keperibadian bangsa Malaysia serta maksud kenegaraan sebenar dapat dicapai di samping mengelak pertembungan perbezaan, keistimewaan, hak dan konflik antara kaum dapat diatasi dengan sebaiknya.

"Sewajarnya kemerdekaan bukanlah dengan membahagi-bahagikan penduduk negara ini kepada kaum Melayu, Cina dan India yang menjurus ke arah konflik antara kaum dan inilah rangka kemerdekaan yang dimahukan oleh British pada masa itu," katanya.

Selain itu, isu sensitif perjuangan Parti Komunis Malaya bersama parti-parti nasionalis Melayu yang diharamkan telah mengangkat senjata menentang British turut dibincangkan demi memberikan keadilan dalam sejarah menuntut kemerdekaan.

"Bayangkan Ketua Polis Negara (KPN) yang pertama selepas merdeka menggelar anak tempatan seperti Adullah CD, Rashid Mydin, Shamsiah Fakeh dan Musa Ahmad sebagai pengganas," kata James Wong.

" Dia (KPN) adalah British yang lahir dari London dan ini hampir sama dengan Bush yang lahir di Amerika pergi ke Afganistan memanggil anak tempatan Osama ben Laden sebagai pengganas," katanya.

Dr Dzulkifli menegaskan pensejarahan semula perjuangan kemerdekaan negara ini amat penting demi menjamin keadilan dan kebenaran fakta sejarah kemerdekaan keseluruhannya.
Secara sinis menyatakan kepada khalayak bahawa tidak mahu berlaku seperti pepatah 'The victor writes history, the loser writes poetry' (Yang juara menulis sejarah, yang kalah menulis sajak).

Majlis tersebut menjadi rancak apabila ahli panel dihujani dengan pelbagai soalan termasuk isu-isu sensitif tentang perjuangan Chin Peng dan Komunis berakhir sekitar jam 12 tengah malam. - lanh